Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37007095›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting prognosis and guiding individualized postoperative chemotherapy: A real-world study of distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Di Wang, Bing Pan, Jin-Can Huang, Qing Chen, Song-Ping Cui, Ren Lang, Shao-Cheng Lyu

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A logistic regression model to predict long-term survival for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients with upfront surgery.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Application of AI on cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Di WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Bing PanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jin-Can HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qing ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Song-Ping CuiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ren LangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shao-Cheng LyuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA), originating from the common bile duct, is greatly associated with a dismal prognosis. A series of different studies based on cancer classification have been developed, aimed to optimize therapy and predict and improve prognosis. In this study, we explored and compared several novel machine learning models that might lead to an improvement in prediction accuracy and treatment options for patients with dCCA. Methods: In this study, 169 patients with dCCA were recruited and randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 118) and the validation cohort (n = 51), and their medical records were reviewed, including survival outcomes, laboratory values, treatment strategies, pathological results, and demographic information. Variables identified as independently associated with the primary outcome by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, the random survival forest (RSF) algorithm, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were introduced to establish the following different machine learning models and canonical regression model: support vector machine (SVM), SurvivalTree, Coxboost, RSF, DeepSurv, and Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH). We measured and compared the performance of models using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, integrated Brier score (IBS), and concordance index (C-index) following cross-validation. The machine learning model with the best performance was screened out and compared with the TNM Classification using ROC, IBS, and C-index. Finally, patients were stratified based on the model with the best performance to assess whether they benefited from postoperative chemotherapy through the log-rank test. Results: Among medical features, five variables, including tumor differentiation, T-stage, lymph node metastasis (LNM), albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio (AFR), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), were used to develop machine learning models. In the training cohort and the validation cohort, C-index achieved 0.763 Conclusions: In this study, the DeepSurv model was good at predicting prognosis and risk stratification to guide treatment options. AFR level might be a potential prognostic factor for dCCA. For the low-risk group in the DeepSurv model, patients might benefit from postoperative chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AFRDeepSurvdistal cholangiocarcinomaindividualized treatmentmachine learningpost-operative chemotherapyrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID37007095
PMCPMC10050553
OpenAlexW4324378575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read22
table measurements read2
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.