ArticleJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases2023
Diagnostic accuracy of the NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and infection with
Article in Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Diagnostic value of the combined test of leukocytes in urine and TB-DOT and T-SPOT.TB in blood for urinary tuberculosis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Quantum Dot-Based Nanosensors for In Vitro Detection ofNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid Test is a commercially available lateral flow serological assay that is intended to be used as an aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. We conducted a study to estimate diagnostic accuracy of this assay for diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease and for detection of Methods: This study used existing frozen plasma specimens that had been obtained previously from consenting HIV-negative adults in Cambodia, South Africa, and Vietnam whose tuberculosis status was rigorously characterized using sputum mycobacterial cultures and blood interferon gamma release assay. The investigational assay was performed in a single laboratory by laboratory staff specifically trained to conduct the assays according to the manufacturer's procedures. In addition, intensity of the test band was subjectively assessed. Results: Plasma specimens from 150 participants were tested. All testing attempts yielded a determinate result of either positive or negative. For diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease, test sensitivity and specificity were 40.0 % (20/50, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 27.6 % to 53.8 %) and 85.0 % (95 % CI 76.7 % to 90.7 %), respectively. For detection of Conclusion: Study findings do not support a role for the NOVA Tuberculosis Test in current tuberculosis diagnostic algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.