Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37006989›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Current Fat Grafting Practices and Preferences: A Survey from Members of ISPRES.

Macarena Vizcay, Shivangi Saha, Arbab Mohammad, Lee L Q Pu, Kotaro Yoshimura, Guy Magalon, Roger Khouri, Sydney Coleman, Gino Rigotti, Stefania DeFazio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Macarena VizcayReconstructive Microsurgery Service, University Department of Hand Surgery & Rehabilitation, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS MultiMedica Group Milan, Italy.
Shivangi SahaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burns Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Arbab MohammadAarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.
Lee L Q PuDivision of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Ca.
Kotaro YoshimuraDepartment of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Guy MagalonDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Roger KhouriMiami Breast Center, Key Biscayne, Fla.
Sydney ColemanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Gino RigottiSan Francesco Hospital, Via Monte Ortigara, Verona, Italy.
Stefania DeFazioBoard Certified Plastic Surgeon, Rome, Italy; Secretary, ISPRES.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INMultiMedica · ITAarupadai Veedu Medical College & Hospital · INAix-Marseille Université · FRJichi Medical University · JPUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fat grafting has established its niche in a wide spectrum of aesthetic and reconstructive procedures. A consensus-based method of harvest, processing, enrichment, injection, and assessment is lacking, despite the rising trends in its application. We conducted a survey among plastic surgeons to evaluate and identify trends of fat grafting practices. Methods: We conducted an electronic survey with a 30-item questionnaire of 62 members of the International Society of Plastic Regenerative Surgeons. We collected demographic information, techniques, and experiences related to large volume (100-200 ml) and small-volume (<100 ml) fat grafting. Results: The majority of the respondents worked predominantly as aesthetic surgeons. The donor area selection was based on the patient's fat availability (59.7%). For fat enrichment, platelet-rich-plasma and adipose stem cells were routinely used by 12.9% and 9.7% of respondents, respectively. A 3- to 4-mm cannula with three holes was the most preferred instrument for large-volume fat harvesting (69.5%). For small-volume fat grafting, 2-mm cannulas (75.8%) with Mercedes tip (27.3%) were used most commonly. For processing, decantation of fat was performed by 56.5% of respondents (without exclusivity). For handheld injections (without exclusivity), respondents preferred a 1- to 2-mm cannula with a 1 cm Conclusions: The respondents' tendencies were similar to those reported in the previous literature, with some exceptions, such as the technique for preparing fat and enrichment. A wider cross-sectional survey, involving national delegates and global representatives of plastic surgeons, is anticipated.

Identifiers

PMID37006989
PMCPMC10060090
OpenAlexW4361293607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.