Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37006816›Full record

ArticleSocial indicators research2022

What does non-standard employment look like in the United States? An empirical typology of employment quality.

Trevor Peckham, Brian Flaherty, Anjum Hajat, Kaori Fujishiro, Dan Jacoby, Noah Seixas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social indicators research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Employment quality and mortality in Canada.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Investigating Employment Quality for Population Health and Health Equity: A Perspective of Power.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trevor PeckhamUniversity of Washington Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, 4225 Roosevelt Way NE, Suite 100, Box 354695, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0001-8196-4298
Brian FlahertyUniversity of Washington Department of Psychology, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8369-9851
Anjum HajatUniversity of Washington Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kaori FujishiroNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1743-625X
Dan JacobyUniversity of Washington-Bothell, School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Bothell, WA, USA.
Noah SeixasUniversity of Washington Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ALI SHOJAIE · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
The role of precarious work in the production of health disparities in older agesR01AG060011 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HAJAT, ANJUM · 2018 to 2021
$1.7M
Evaluating employment quality as a social determinant of health in a changing economyF31MD013357 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PECKHAM, TREVOR · 2018 to 2019
$85k
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060011NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033NIMHD NIH HHS F31 MD013357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant interest in the changing nature of employment as a critical social and economic challenge facing society-especially the decline in the so-called Standard Employment Relationship (SER) and rise in more insecure, precarious forms of employment-scholars have struggled to operationalize the multifaceted and heterogeneous nature of contemporary worker-employer relationships within empirical analyses. Here we investigate the character and distribution of employment relationships in the U.S., drawing on a representative sample of wage-earners and self-employed from the General Social Survey (2002 - 2018). We use the multidimensional construct of employment quality (EQ), which includes both contractual (e.g., wages, contract type) and relational (e.g., employee representation and participation) aspects of employment. We further employ a typological measurement approach, using latent class analysis, to explicitly examine how the multiple aspects of employment cluster together in modern labor markets. We present eight distinct employment types in the U.S., including one resembling the historical conception of the SER model (24% of the total workforce), and others representing various constellations of favorable and adverse employment features. These employment types are unevenly distributed across society, in terms of who works these jobs and where they are found in the labor market. Importantly, women, those with lower education, and younger workers are more likely to be in precarious forms of employment. More generally, our typology reveals limitations associated with binary conceptions of standard vs. non-standard employment, or insider-outsider dichotomies envisioned within dual labor market theories.

Indexed as

Employment qualitylabor market segmentationlatent class analysisnonstandard employmentprecarious employment

Identifiers

PMID37006816
PMCPMC10062421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.