ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2023
Consistent Protocol-Based Management of Humerus Shaft Nonunion: An Analysis of 100 Cases.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An alternative treatment for aseptic humeral shaft nonunion: intramedullary nailing without grafting.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Comparison of surgical techniques for the treatment of humeral nonunion using the Ilizarov method.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Functional Outcomes in Aseptic Humeral Shaft Nonunion Treated With Plate Osteosynthesis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Treatment of infected humeral shaft nonunion and presumed aseptic nonunion with positive intraoperative cultures: a retrospective single-center study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- Operative Management of Aseptic Humeral Shaft Nonunion: A Retrospective Study from Eastern India.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Humerus shaft nonunions are very disabling and challenging to treat. The current study aims to analyse the rate of union and the incidence of complications following a consistent protocol in treating humerus shaft nonunion. Methodology: We did a retrospective analysis of 100 patients with humerus shaft nonunion treated over an eight-year period from 2014 to 2021. The mean age was 42 years (range 18-75 years). There were 53 male and 47 female patients. The average time interval from injury to nonunion surgery was 23 months (range 3 months to 23 years). The series included 12 recalcitrant nonunions and 12 patients with septic nonunion. All patients underwent freshening of fracture edges to increase the contact surface area, stable fixation with a locking plate and intramedullary iliac crest bone grafting. Infective nonunions were treated in a staged manner, following a similar treatment protocol after the elimination of infection in the first stage. Results: Complete union was achieved in 97% of the patients with a single procedure. One patient achieved union after an additional procedure, while two patients were lost to further follow-up. The mean time to union was 5.7 months (range 3-10 months). Three patients (3%) had postoperative radial nerve palsy, which recovered completely within 6 months. Three patients (3%) had a superficial surgical site infection, while one patient (1%) developed a deep infection. Conclusion: Intramedullary cancellous autologous grafts combined with stable fixation by compression plating achieve a high union rate with minimal complications. Level of Evidence: III. Level of Clinical Care: Level I Tertiary trauma centre.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.