Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37006706›Full record

ReviewLe praticien en anesthesie reanimation2020

[Intensive Care Unit patients' relatives' relationship in the settings of restrictive conditions].

Fabienne Fieux, Nicolas Hantala, Lea Satre-Buisson, Buenn Quillerou

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Le praticien en anesthesie reanimation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabienne FieuxService d'anesthesie-réanimation, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne université, 184, rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France.
Nicolas HantalaService d'anesthesie-réanimation, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne université, 184, rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France.
Lea Satre-BuissonService d'anesthesie-réanimation, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne université, 184, rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France.
Buenn QuillerouService de psychiatrie adulte, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne université, 184, rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social distancing steps have been set during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. Patients' families brought their relatives to the emergency department and did not see them again for weeks due to lockdown of the whole population. Caregivers understood and approved the restriction of visits in ICU, in order to limit epidemic spreading, worried by overwhelming of their capacity would be overwhelmed and that they would not be able to admit all the patients requiring intensive care. However, they quickly sought to compensate by creating different relationships with relatives, using new ways of communication enabling patients and their relatives to keep in touch. Letters, messages services, phone calls and e-visits were set up. This brought new risks such as patient' images diffusion on social networks. In addition, relatives, caught with contradictory stressful information provided by medias, did not always understand that they could not have a direct access to patients and put psychological pressure on healthcare providers. Considering that previous recommendations support an unrestricted access of relatives to the ICU patients, caregivers have had to deal with new rules and have got experience that will be useful in case of the occurrence of comparable events.

Indexed as

Connection with patients’ relativesCOVID-19Intensive care unitPatient’ relatives

Identifiers

PMID37006706
PMCPMC10043992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.