Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37006586›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Understanding influencing attributes of COVID-19 vaccine preference and willingness-to-pay among Chinese and American middle-aged and elderly adults: A discrete choice experiment and propensity score matching study.

Xialei Li, Liujun Yang, Guanghua Tian, Bojunhao Feng, Xiaocen Jia, Zonglin He, Taoran Liu, Xianqi Zhao, Mengjie Huang, Wenli Yu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Xialei LiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Liujun YangSchool of Public Administration, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
Guanghua TianDepartment of Public Health and Health Management, Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Bojunhao FengFaculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.
Xiaocen JiaSchool of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zonglin HeInternational School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Taoran LiuDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xianqi ZhaoSchool of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Mengjie HuangSchool of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Wenli YuSchool of Liberal Education, Weifang University of Science and Technology, Weifang, China.
Lian YuSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Wai-Kit MingDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinan University · CNShandong University · CNAnhui Medical University · CNMacau University of Science and Technology · MOQingdao University · CNRenmin University of China · CNWeifang University of Science and Technology · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: COVID-19 has imposed burdens on public health systems globally. Owing to the urgency of vaccination, this study aimed at comparing the differences in preference and willingness to pay of COVID-19 vaccine among Chinese and American middle-aged and elderly adults. Methods: A cross-sectional survey containing demographic questions, rating their acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination with and without recommendations from friends, family members or employers (the social cues referred to in our study), and a discrete choice experiment understanding COVID-19 vaccine preference and willingness to pay was conducted to collect data. Propensity score matching was utilized to adjust confounding factors of baseline characteristics and the relative importance of respondents' preference for each attribute and its level was estimated using a conditional logit model. Then, willingness to pay was calculated. Results: In total, 3,494 (2,311 and 1,183 from China and the United States, respectively) completed the questionnaire, among which 3,444 questionnaires were effective. After propensity score matching, 1,604 respondents with 802 from the US and 802 from China were included. Under the influence of the social cues, Chinese respondents' vaccine acceptance decreased from 71.70 to 70.70%, while American respondents' vaccine acceptance increased from 74.69 to 75.81%. The discrete choice experiment showed that American respondents regarded the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine as the most important attribute, whereas Chinese respondents attached the highest importance to the cost of vaccination. But overall, the COVID-19 vaccine with the higher efficacy, the milder adverse effect, the lower cost, and the longer duration will promote the preference of the public in both countries. Additionally, the public were willing to spend the most money for a reduction in COVID-19 vaccine adverse effect from moderate to very mild (37.476USD for the United States, 140.503USD for China), followed by paying for the 1% improvement in its efficacy and paying for the one-month extension of its duration. Conclusion: Given the impact of social cues on vaccine acceptance, Chinese government should promote reasonable vaccine-related information to improve national vaccination acceptance. Meanwhile, considering the influence of COVID-19 attributes on public preference and willingness to pay, regulating the vaccine pricing, improving the efficacy of the vaccine, reducing its adverse effect, and prolonging the duration of the vaccine works will contribute to vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdultAgedCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreUnited StatesCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinemiddle-aged and elderly adultspublic healthvaccine acceptancevaccine preferencewillingness to pay

Identifiers

PMID37006586
PMCPMC10060971
OpenAlexW4327615884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.