Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37006532›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Spain and associated factors.

Maria Falcon, Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez, María Romay-Barja, Alba Ayala, Alfredo Burgos, María José De Tena-Dávila, Maria João Forjaz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria FalconLegal Medicine Department, Biomedical Research Institute (IMIB), University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Carmen Rodríguez-BlázquezNational Epidemiology Center, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
María Romay-BarjaNational Center of Tropical Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Alba AyalaUniversity Institute on Gender Studies, University Carlos III, Getafe, Spain.
Alfredo BurgosDigital Health Research Unit, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
María José De Tena-DávilaDigital Health Research Unit, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Maria João ForjazNational Epidemiology Center, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESRed de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud · ESUniversidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The present study explores the reasons of those who have not been vaccinated in the later stage of the vaccine rollout in Spain and its associated determinants. Methods: Cluster and logistic regression analyses were used to assess differences in claimed reasons for vaccine hesitancy in Spain using two samples of unvaccinated people (18-40 years old) gathered by an online cross-sectional survey from social networks ( Results: The main reasons for not being vaccinated were believing that the COVID-19 vaccines had been developed too fast, they were experimental, and they were not safe, endorsed by 68.7% participants in the social network sample and 55.4% in the panel sample. The cluster analysis classified the participants into two groups. Logistic regression showed that Cluster 2 (individuals who reported structural constraints and health-related reasons such as pregnancy or medical recommendation) presented a lower trust in information from health professionals, had a lower willingness to get vaccinated in the future, and avoided less social/family events than those in Cluster 1 (reasons centered in distrust on COVID-19 vaccines, conspiracy thoughts and complacency). Conclusions: It is important to promote information campaigns that provide reliable information and fight fake news and myths. Future vaccination intention differs in both clusters, so these results are important for developing strategies target to increase vaccination uptake for those who do not reject the COVID-19 vaccine completely.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentAdultCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancySpainYoung AdultCOVID-19 Vaccinesbehavioral insightsCOVID-19hesitancypublic healthvaccine

Identifiers

PMID37006532
PMCPMC10061089
OpenAlexW4327604781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.