ArticleJournal of vitreoretinal diseases
Microbial Spectrum and Antibacterial Susceptibility of Endophthalmitis Cultures in a Tertiary Referral Center in the Midwestern United States: An Analysis From 295 Patients.
Article in Journal of vitreoretinal diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The diagnosis and treatment progress of infectious endophthalmitis.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Microbial Characteristics and Etiologic Patterns of Endophthalmitis at a Tertiary Referral Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Kansas journal of medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This work evaluates the microbial spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of endophthalmitis cases in a large tertiary referral center in the Midwestern United States. Methods: This retrospective case series included patients with clinically diagnosed endophthalmitis between April 14, 2006 and April 14, 2016, in whom ocular samples were submitted to the Microbiology Department at Indiana University. The patients were assessed by 11 vitreoretinal surgeons from 6 different sites in Indianapolis, including Indiana University and private practices, who receive patients from urban, suburban, and rural agricultural areas. Submitted specimens were cultured with the following media: blood agar, chocolate agar, MacConkey agar, and thioglycolate broth. Results: A total of 327 specimens from 295 patients were analyzed, with 96 (32.5%) samples from 90 (30.5%) patients meeting the criteria of confirmed growth. Of these 96 positive specimens, 83 (86.5%) organisms were identified as bacterial, and 13 (13.5%) were identified as fungal. Coagulase-negative Conclusions: Empiric treatment with vancomycin and ceftazidime remains appropriate in most cases of endophthalmitis in the Midwestern United States, with 100% susceptibility of bacterial organisms tested with these antibiotics in this series. The high fungal culture rates in this study highlight the utility of obtaining vitreous cultures and potential need for antifungal agents in suspicious cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.