Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37006460›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2023

Comparison of IVIg and TPE efficacy in the treatment of neurological disorders: a systematic literature review.

Ashwin A Pinto, Jerome De Seze, Anu Jacob, Stephen Reddel, Anna Yudina, Kevin Tan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Ashwin A PintoDepartment of Neurology, Wessex Neurological Centre, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5649-9600
Jerome De SezeDepartment of Neurology, CHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Anu JacobDepartment of Neurology, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen ReddelDepartment of Neurology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anna YudinaTerumo Blood and Cell Technologies, Zaventem, Belgium.
Kevin TanDepartment of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore.
Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg · FRNational Neuroscience Institute · SGSouthampton General Hospital · GBTerumo (Belgium) · BEThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) are among the main immunotherapies for neurological disorders. Their benefit is greatest in immune-mediated conditions, but their distinct efficacy cannot be simply explained. Objectives: This review aimed to systematically identify studies comparing the efficacy of TPE and IVIg treatments for selected autoimmune neurological disorders and identify optimal therapies for each condition. Data Sources and Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for original publications from 1990 to 2021. Additional publications were identified Results: Forty-four studies were included on Guillain-Barré syndrome (20 studies - 12 adult, 5 paediatric, 3 all ages), myasthenia gravis (11 studies -8 adult, 3 paediatric), chronic immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy (3 studies -1 adult, 2 paediatric), encephalitis (1 study in adults), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (5 studies -2 adult, 3 all ages) and other conditions (4 studies - all ages). TPE and IVIg were mostly similarly efficacious, measured by clinical outcomes and disease severity scores. Some studies recommended IVIg as easy to administer. TPE procedures, however, have been simplified and the safety has been improved. TPE is currently recommended for management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder relapses and some myasthenia gravis subtypes, in which rapid removal of autoantibodies is crucial. Conclusion: Despite some limitations (e.g. the low evidence levels), this review provides an extensive 30-year-long overview of treatments for various conditions. Both IVIg and TPE are usually comparably efficacious options for autoimmune neurological disorders, with few exceptions. Treatment choices should be patient-tailored and based on available clinical resources. Better designed studies are needed to provide higher-level quality of evidence regarding clinical efficacy of TPE and IVIg treatments.

Indexed as

autoantibodiesautoimmune neurological disordersintravenous immunoglobulinIVIgtherapeutic plasma exchangeTPEtreatment efficacy

Identifiers

PMID37006460
PMCPMC10064470
OpenAlexW4361801824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.