Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37006369›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2023

3DProtDTA: a deep learning model for drug-target affinity prediction based on residue-level protein graphs.

Taras Voitsitskyi, Roman Stratiichuk, Ihor Koleiev, Leonid Popryho, Zakhar Ostrovsky, Pavlo Henitsoi, Ivan Khropachov, Volodymyr Vozniak, Roman Zhytar, Diana Nechepurenko and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Drug-Target Interaction Prediction with PIGLET.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. DrugForm-DTA: Towards real-world drug-target binding affinity model.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Taras VoitsitskyiReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-3688
Roman StratiichukReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.
Ihor KoleievReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.
Leonid PopryhoReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.
Zakhar OstrovskyReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.
Pavlo HenitsoiReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.
Ivan KhropachovReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.
Volodymyr VozniakReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.
Roman ZhytarReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.
Diana NechepurenkoReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.
Semen YesylevskyyReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6748-8931
Alan NafiievReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.
Serhii StarosylaReceptor.AI Inc. 20-22 Wenlock Road London N1 7GU UK taras270698@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5103-0635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the drug-target affinity (DTA)

Identifiers

PMID37006369
PMCPMC10065141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.