Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37006334›Full record

ArticleHealth services research and managerial epidemiology

COVID-19 Infection Risk Among Previously Uninfected Adults: Development of a Prognostic Model.

Richard Sloane, Carl F Pieper, Richard Faldowski, Douglas Wixted, Coralei E Neighbors, Christopher W Woods, L Kristin Newby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research and managerial epidemiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard SloaneCenter for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-8101
Carl F PieperCenter for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Richard FaldowskiCenter for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Douglas WixtedDuke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Coralei E NeighborsHubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-2983
Christopher W WoodsHubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
L Kristin NewbyDuke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

Support for QA/QC for Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002553 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JENNIFER S, MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2018 to 2023
$58.5M
Resource Core 3 - Metabolomics CoreP30AG028716 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CATHLEEN S COLON-EMERIC, Susan Nicole Hastings · 2006 to 2026
$24.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002553NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Few models exist that incorporate measures from an array of individual characteristics to predict the risk of COVID-19 infection in the general population. The aim was to develop a prognostic model for COVID-19 using readily obtainable clinical variables. Methods: Over 74 weeks surveys were periodically administered to a cohort of 1381 participants previously uninfected with COVID-19 (June 2020 to December 2021). Candidate predictors of incident infection during follow-up included demographics, living situation, financial status, physical activity, health conditions, flu vaccination history, COVID-19 vaccine intention, work/employment status, and use of COVID-19 mitigation behaviors. The final logistic regression model was created using a penalized regression method known as the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Model performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. Internal validation was performed via bootstrapping, and results were adjusted for overoptimism. Results: Of the 1381 participants, 154 (11.2%) had an incident COVID-19 infection during the follow-up period. The final model included six variables: health insurance, race, household size, and the frequency of practicing three mitigation behavior (working at home, avoiding high-risk situations, and using facemasks). The c-statistic of the final model was 0.631 (0.617 after bootstrapped optimism-correction). A calibration plot suggested that with this sample the model shows modest concordance with incident infection at the lowest risk. Conclusion: This prognostic model can help identify which community-dwelling older adults are at the highest risk for incident COVID-19 infection and may inform medical provider counseling of their patients about the risk of incident COVID-19 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19infectionprediction model

Identifiers

PMID37006334
PMCPMC10052611
OpenAlexW4361013648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.