ArticleNeurophotonics2023
Influence of oversimplifying the head anatomy on cerebral blood flow measurements with diffuse correlation spectroscopy.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation between diffuse correlation spectroscopy and transcranial Doppler ultrasound in pediatric sickle cell disease.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Comparison of diffuse correlation spectroscopy analytical models for cerebral blood flow measurements.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Non-ergodicity and noise-corrected diffuse speckle contrast analysis in deep tissue blood flow measurement.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Modified Beer-Lambert algorithm to measure pulsatile blood flow, critical closing pressure, and intracranial hypertension.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparison of diffuse correlation spectroscopy analytical models for measuring cerebral blood flow in adults.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Diffuse Correlation Spectroscopy: A Review of Recent Advances in Parallelisation and Depth Discrimination Techniques.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- scatterBrains: an open database of human head models and companion optode locations for realistic Monte Carlo photon simulations.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Measuring human cerebral blood flow and brain function with fiber-based speckle contrast optical spectroscopy system.Communications biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) is an emerging optical modality for non-invasive assessment of an index of regional cerebral blood flow. By the nature of this noninvasive measurement, light must pass through extracerebral layers (i.e., skull, scalp, and cerebral spinal fluid) before detection at the tissue surface. To minimize the contribution of these extracerebral layers to the measured signal, an analytical model has been developed that treats the head as a series of three parallel and infinitely extending slabs (mimicking scalp, skull, and brain). The three-layer model has been shown to provide a significant improvement in cerebral blood flow estimation over the typically used model that treats the head as a bulk homogenous medium. However, the three-layer model is still a gross oversimplification of the head geometry that ignores head curvature, the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and heterogeneity in layer thickness. Aim: Determine the influence of oversimplifying the head geometry on cerebral blood flow estimated with the three-layer model. Approach: Data were simulated with Monte Carlo in a four-layer slab medium and a three-layer sphere medium to isolate the influence of CSF and curvature, respectively. Additionally, simulations were performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) head templates spanning a wide-range of ages. Simulated data were fit to both the homogenous and three-layer model for CBF. Finally, to mitigate the errors in potential CBF estimation due to the difficulty in defining layer thickness, we investigated an approach to identify an equivalent, "optimized" thickness via a pressure modulation. Results: Both head curvature and failing to account for CSF lead to significant errors in the estimation of CBF. However, the effect of curvature and CSF on relative changes in CBF is minimal. Further, we found that CBF was underestimated in all MRI-templates, although the magnitude of these underestimations was highly influenced by small variations in the source and detector optode positioning. The optimized thickness obtained from pressure modulation did not improve estimation accuracy of CBF, although it did significantly improve the estimation accuracy of relative changes in CBF. Conclusions: In sum, these findings suggest that the three-layer model holds promise for improving estimation of relative changes in cerebral blood flow; however, estimations of absolute cerebral blood flow with the approach should be viewed with caution given that it is difficult to account for appreciable sources of error, such as curvature and CSF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.