Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37006272›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Rapid, early, and potent Spike-directed IgG, IgM, and IgA distinguish asymptomatic from mildly symptomatic COVID-19 in Uganda, with IgG persisting for 28 months.

Jennifer Serwanga, Violet Ankunda, Jackson Sembera, Laban Kato, Gerald Kevin Oluka, Claire Baine, Geoffrey Odoch, John Kayiwa, Betty Oliver Auma, Mark Jjuuko and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jennifer SerwangaPathogen Genomics, Phenotype, and Immunity Program, Medical Research Council, Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Violet AnkundaDepartment of Immunology, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Jackson SemberaDepartment of Immunology, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Laban KatoPathogen Genomics, Phenotype, and Immunity Program, Medical Research Council, Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Gerald Kevin OlukaPathogen Genomics, Phenotype, and Immunity Program, Medical Research Council, Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Claire BaineDepartment of Immunology, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Geoffrey OdochPathogen Genomics, Phenotype, and Immunity Program, Medical Research Council, Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
John KayiwaDepartment of Virology, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Betty Oliver AumaPathogen Genomics, Phenotype, and Immunity Program, Medical Research Council, Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Mark JjuukoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Masaka Regional Referral Hospital, Masaka, Uganda.
Christopher NserekoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Entebbe Regional Referral Hospital, Entebbe, Uganda.
Matthew CottenPathogen Genomics, Phenotype, and Immunity Program, Medical Research Council, Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Nathan OnyachiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Masaka Regional Referral Hospital, Masaka, Uganda.
Moses MuwangaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Entebbe Regional Referral Hospital, Entebbe, Uganda.
Tom LutaloDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Management, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Julie FoxGuy's and St Thomas' National Health Services Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Monica MuseneroScience, Technology, and Innovation Secretariat, Office of the President, Government of Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Pontiano KaleebuPathogen Genomics, Phenotype, and Immunity Program, Medical Research Council, Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
COVID-19 Immunoprofiling Team

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19026Medical Research Council MC_UU_00027/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00027/5NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400008C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding how spike (S)-, nucleoprotein (N)-, and RBD-directed antibody responses evolved in mild and asymptomatic COVID-19 in Africa and their interactions with SARS-CoV-2 might inform development of targeted treatments and vaccines. Methods: Here, we used a validated indirect in-house ELISA to characterise development and persistence of S- and N-directed IgG, IgM, and IgA antibody responses for 2430 SARS-CoV-2 rt-PCR-diagnosed Ugandan specimens from 320 mild and asymptomatic COVID-19 cases, 50 uninfected contacts, and 54 uninfected non-contacts collected weekly for one month, then monthly for 28 months. Results: During acute infection, asymptomatic patients mounted a faster and more robust spike-directed IgG, IgM, and IgA response than those with mild symptoms (Wilcoxon rank test, p-values 0.046, 0.053, and 0.057); this was more pronounced in males than females. Spike IgG antibodies peaked between 25 and 37 days (86.46; IQR 29.47-242.56 BAU/ml), were significantly higher and more durable than N- and RBD IgG antibodies and lasted for 28 months. Anti-spike seroconversion rates consistently exceeded RBD and nucleoprotein rates. Spike- and RBD-directed IgG antibodies were positively correlated until 14 months (Spearman's rank correlation test, p-values 0.0001 to 0.05), although RBD diminished faster. Significant anti-spike immunity persisted without RBD. 64% and 59% of PCR-negative, non-infected non-contacts and suspects, exhibited baseline SARS-CoV-2 N-IgM serological cross-reactivity, suggesting undetected exposure or abortive infection. N-IgG levels waned after 787 days, while N-IgM levels remained undetectable throughout. Discussion: Lower N-IgG seroconversion rates and the absence of N-IgM indicate that these markers substantially underestimate the prior exposure rates. Our findings provide insights into the development of S-directed antibody responses in mild and asymptomatic infections, with varying degrees of symptoms eliciting distinct immune responses, suggesting distinct pathogenic pathways. These longer-lasting data inform vaccine design, boosting strategies, and surveillance efforts in this and comparable settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, ViralFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MMaleSARS-CoV-2UgandaAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MIgAIgGIgMmild and asymptomatic COVID-19nucleoproteinSARS-CoV-2 antibody persistenceSpike and RBDUganda

Identifiers

PMID37006272
PMCPMC10060567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.