ArticleUrology annals
Evaluation of intermittent tamsulosin in treating symptomatic patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alpha-Adrenoceptor Blockade as a Novel Pathway Toward Non-Hormonal Male Contraception: A Mechanistic and Clinical Evidence Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate and assess the effect of intermittent tamsulosin treatment as a trial to increase the drug safety (in terms of reducing the drug side effects, particularly retrograde ejaculation) while maintaining the effect in reducing the symptoms and assess its impact on the patients' quality of life. Materials and Methods: Patients who enrolled in this study were suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and were using 0.4 mg tamsulosin daily to relieve their symptoms but complained of ejaculatory problems. A baseline assessment involves medical history and evaluation of ejaculatory function abdominopelvic ultrasound, postvoid residual volume (PVR) estimation, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life assessed using global satisfaction, vital signs, physical examination including digital rectal examination, and renal function. During the study, patients consented to take 0.4 mg tamsulosin intermittently every other day and to proceed with their sexual activities on the days they did not take the drug in. Baseline assessment was repeated and recorded after 3 months from starting the treatment. The adverse effects and compliance were analyzed in all patients. Results: Twenty-five patients had a mean baseline IPSS of 6.6 ± 1 and baseline PVR of 87.6 ± 15.1 ml. At the 3 Conclusion: Intermittent tamsulosin therapy (0.4 mg/every other day) is well-tolerated and shows a potential advantage in recovery in patients who suffer from LUTS/BPH and complaining from abnormal ejaculation, especially absent ejaculate. Although there was a significant change in PVR and IPSS after using intermittent tamsulosin therapy. Most patients show a higher overall satisfaction with the treatment compared to the standard dose (0.4 mg/daily). A study on a larger scale is still needed to confirm our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.