ArticleUrology annals
Management of rectal injury and rectourinary fistula from radical prostatectomy.
Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced precision in prostate surgery: determining key factors for rectal positive surgical margins through integrated imaging and clinical data analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Prevalence and influencing factors of social alienation among elderly patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.Current urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate our management of rectal injury (RI) and rectourinary fistula (RUF) from radical prostatectomy (RP) and identify a possible factor that increased the chance of developing RUF. Materials and Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2019, a total of 14 cases of RI were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed, including preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative information. Results: In all 14 cases of RI, the average age at RP was 66.3 years (54-77). During the study period, 8 of 14 cases of RI occurred in our hospital, and the incidence of RI was 0.42%. RI was intraoperative recognition in 8 cases and delayed diagnosis in 6 cases. For immediate recognition, 4 of 8 cases were primarily repaired without developing RUF and did not require diverting colostomy and suprapubic cystostomy. RUF occurred in 10 cases including 4 cases of intraoperative recognition and all cases of delayed diagnosis. In a subgroup analysis of RI that occurred in our hospital, the timing for diagnosis was clinically and statistically significant difference ( Conclusions: Incidence of RI was 0.42% and intraoperative recognition of RI was a key to prevent the development of RUF. Modified York-Mason procedure with dartos tissue flap interposition was an effective treatment for RUF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.