ArticleAnalytical chemistry2023
Integrating Magnetic-Bead-Based Sample Extraction and Molecular Barcoding for the One-Step Pooled RT-qPCR Assay of Viral Pathogens without Retesting.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiphysics model for designing magnetic bead collection processes on centrifugal microfluidic platforms.RSC advances · 2026Article
- OptoAssay-Light-controlled dynamic bioassay using optogenetic switches.Science advances · 2024Article
- Deciphering dengue: novel RNA barcoding segments for enhanced serotype-specific identification and global surveillance of dengue viruses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Ready for new waves: optimizing SARS-CoV-2 variants monitoring in pooled samples with droplet digital PCR.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pooling multiple samples prior to real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis has been proposed as a strategy to minimize expenses and boost test throughput during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, the traditional pooling approach cannot be effectively deployed in high-prevalence settings due to the need for secondary tests in the case of a positive pool. In this study, we present a pooling test platform with high adaptability and simplicity that allows sample-specific detection of multiple-tagged samples in a single run without the need for retesting. This was accomplished by labeling distinct samples with predefined ID-Primers and identifying tagged pooled samples using one-step RT-PCR followed by melting curve analysis with rationally designed universal fluorescence- and quencher-tagged oligo probes. Using magnetic beads (MBs), nucleic acid targets from different individuals can be tagged and extracted concurrently and then pooled before RT, eliminating the need for extra RNA extraction and separate RT and enzyme digestion steps in the recently developed barcoding strategies. Pools of six samples (positive and negative) were successfully identified by melting temperature values under two fluorescent channels, with a detection sensitivity of 5 copies/μL. We validated the reproducibility of this assay by running it on 40 clinical samples with a hypothetical infection rate of 15%. In addition, to aid the scenario of large-scale pooling tests, we constructed a melting curve autoreadout system (MCARS) for statistical analysis of melting curve plots to eliminate error-prone manual result readout. Our results suggest that this strategy could be a simple and adaptable tool for alleviating existing bottlenecks in diagnostic pooling testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.