Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37005666›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2023

Tracheostomy timing and outcome in critically ill patients with stroke: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Lavienraj Premraj, Christopher Camarda, Nicole White, Daniel Agustin Godoy, Brian H Cuthbertson, Patricia R M Rocco, Paolo Pelosi, Chiara Robba, Jose I Suarez, Sung-Min Cho and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07769021 (Observational iNternational Study of TRACHeostomy Practice in Adult Intensive Care Units - ON TRACH), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07769021 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Observational iNternational Study of TRACHeostomy Practice in Adult Intensive Care Units - ON TRACH

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal College of Surgeons, IrelandRan2026 to 2029Enrolled2,500ConditionsTracheostomy Patients, Tracheostomy Decannulation, Intensive Care (ICU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Risk factors for prolonged mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients with ischemic stroke.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Tracheotomy : Indication and implementation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Lavienraj Premraj *Griffith University School of Medicine, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Christopher Camarda *Griffith University School of Medicine, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Nicole WhiteAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI) and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Daniel Agustin GodoyNeurointensive Care Unit, Critical Care Department, Sanatorio Pasteur, Chacabuco 675, 4700, Catamarca, Argentina.
Brian H CuthbertsonDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Patricia R M RoccoLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Paolo PelosiIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Chiara RobbaIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Jose I SuarezDivision of Neurosciences Critical Care, Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine and Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Sung-Min Cho *Division of Neurosciences Critical Care, Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine and Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Denise Battaglini *IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy. battaglini.denise@gmail.com.
Griffith University · AUOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational University of Catamarca · ARQueensland University of Technology · AUUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CLots and Oxygen in Va-ExtracorpoReal membrane oxygenation (CLOVER) studyK23HL157610 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Sung-Min Cho · 2022 to 2026
$797k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL157610NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL165486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke patients requiring mechanical ventilation often have a poor prognosis. The optimal timing of tracheostomy and its impact on mortality in stroke patients remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of tracheostomy timing and its association with reported all-cause overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were the effect of tracheostomy timing on neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS), hospital length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS.

methodsWe searched 5 databases for entries related to acute stroke and tracheostomy from inception to 25 November 2022. We adhered to PRISMA guidance for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Selected studies included (1) ICU-admitted patients who had stroke (either acute ischaemic stroke, AIS or intracerebral haemorrhage, ICH) and received a tracheostomy (with known timing) during their stay and (2) > 20 tracheotomised. Studies primarily reporting sub-arachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) were excluded. Where this was not possible, adjusted meta-analysis and meta-regression with study-level moderators were performed. Tracheostomy timing was analysed continuously and categorically, where early (< 5 days from initiation of mechanical ventilation to tracheostomy) and late (> 10 days) timing was defined per the protocol of SETPOINT2, the largest and most recent randomised controlled trial on tracheostomy timing in stroke patients.

resultsThirteen studies involving 17,346 patients (mean age = 59.8 years, female 44%) met the inclusion criteria. ICH, AIS, and SAH comprised 83%, 12%, and 5% of known strokes, respectively. The mean time to tracheostomy was 9.7 days. Overall reported all-cause mortality (adjusted for follow-up) was 15.7%. One in five patients had good neurological outcome (mRS 0-3; median follow-up duration was 180 days). Overall, patients were ventilated for approximately 12 days and had an ICU LOS of 16 days and a hospital LOS of 28 days. A meta-regression analysis using tracheostomy time as a continuous variable showed no statistically significant association between tracheostomy timing and mortality (β = - 0.3, 95% CI = - 2.3 to 1.74, p = 0.8). Early tracheostomy conferred no mortality benefit when compared to late tracheostomy (7.8% vs. 16.4%, p = 0.7). Tracheostomy timing was not associated with secondary outcomes (good neurological outcome, ICU LOS and hospital LOS).

conclusionsIn this meta-analysis of over 17,000 critically ill stroke patients, the timing of tracheostomy was not associated with mortality, neurological outcomes, or ICU/hospital LOS.

trial registrationPROSPERO-CRD42022351732 registered on 17th of August 2022.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaStrokeCerebral HemorrhageCritical CareCritical IllnessFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialCritically illHaemorrhagicIschaemicMechanical ventilationStrokeTracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID37005666
PMCPMC10068163
OpenAlexW4362523455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.