SynthesisBMC health services research2023
The application of spatial measures to analyse health service accessibility in Australia: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Essential service accessibility and contribution to quality of life: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Measuring Mental Health Service Accessibility for Indigenous Populations: a Systematic Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to women's access to sexual and reproductive health services in rural Australia: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Gravity models for potential spatial healthcare access measurement: a systematic methodological review.International journal of health geographics · 2023Pooled it
- Who Gets Referred for What? Large Scale Analysis of Clinical, Socioeconomic and Demographic Drivers Within Electronic Optometry Referrals.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Occupational Licensing and Psychologist Supply.Health economics · 2026Article
- Implementation of an Occupation-Based Practice Strategy in a Metropolitan Health Service: A Case Study.Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy · 2026Article
- Exploring cross-city hospital visiting trips for medical service evaluation in urban agglomeration areas based on automobile navigation data.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Next-GenInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Quantifying and Understanding Healthcare Service Access for Geographically Distributed Communities: The Application of Address-Level Intelligence.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Article
- Area remoteness and the distribution and attrition of the rural health workforce in Australia.Human resources for health · 2026Article
- Mobile signaling big data, healthcare-seeking flows, and multidimensional healthcare access in Shanghai: implications for healthcare supply-demand matching and medical security governance.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Geographical accessibility to smoking cessation treatment facilities across 335 medical areas in Japan: A nationwide cross-sectional descriptive study using large-scale geospatial data.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- Determinants of breast screening participation using small-area data in South Australia: gaining past and future insights from geospatial evidence.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Article
- Socio-spatial inequalities in accessibility of Indigenous community-controlled mental health services in South East Queensland, Australia.International journal of health geographics · 2025Article
- Article
- Measures of the Availability and Accessibility of Behavioral Health Services: A Scoping Review.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- The development and validation of Spatial Methodology Appraisal of Research Tool (SMART): a concept mapping study.International journal of health geographics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAustralia's inequitable distribution of health services is well documented. Spatial access relates to the geographic limitations affecting the availability and accessibility of healthcare practitioners and services. Issues associated with spatial access are often influenced by Australia's vast landmass, challenging environments, uneven population concentration, and sparsely distributed populations in rural and remote areas. Measuring access contributes to a broader understanding of the performance of health systems, particularly in rural/remote areas. This systematic review synthesises the evidence identifying what spatial measures and geographic classifications are used and how they are applied in the Australian peer-reviewed literature.
methodsA systematic search of peer-reviewed literature published between 2002 and 2022 was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Search terms were derived from three major topics, including: [1] Australian population; [2] spatial analysis of health service accessibility; and [3] objective physical access measures.
resultsDatabase searches retrieved 1,381 unique records. Records were screened for eligibility, resulting in 82 articles for inclusion. Most articles analysed access to primary health services (n = 50; 61%), followed by specialist care (n = 17; 21%), hospital services (n = 12; 15%), and health promotion and prevention (n = 3; 4%). The geographic scope of the 82 articles included national (n = 33; 40%), state (n = 27; 33%), metropolitan (n = 18; 22%), and specified regional / rural /remote area (n = 4; 5%). Most articles used distance-based physical access measures, including travel time (n = 30; 37%) and travel distance along a road network (n = 21; 26%), and Euclidean distance (n = 24; 29%).
conclusionThis review is the first comprehensive systematic review to synthesise the evidence on how spatial measures have been applied to measure health service accessibility in the Australian context over the past two decades. Objective and transparent access measures that are fit for purpose are imperative to address persistent health inequities and inform equitable resource distribution and evidence-based policymaking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.