Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37005570›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2023

An optimized workflow for MS-based quantitative proteomics of challenging clinical bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples.

Danielle O Weise, Monica E Kruk, LeeAnn Higgins, Todd W Markowski, Pratik D Jagtap, Subina Mehta, Alan Mickelson, Laurie L Parker, Christine H Wendt, Timothy J Griffin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle O WeiseDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Monica E KrukDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
LeeAnn HigginsDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Todd W MarkowskiDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Pratik D JagtapDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Subina MehtaDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Alan MickelsonDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Laurie L ParkerDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Christine H WendtDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Timothy J GriffinDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. tgriffin@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USMinneapolis VA Health Care System · US

Funding

SITE-SPECIFIC RECOMBINATIONR01GM028717 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GARDNER, JEFFREY F · 1985 to 2013
$4.0M
Spingolipids in HIV-associated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseR01HL140971 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GRIFFIN, TIMOTHY J., KUNISAKI, KEN M. · 2018 to 2021
$2.7M
A transformative next-generation Orbitrap Tribrid system for the UMN and Upper MidwestS10OD028717 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GRIFFIN, TIMOTHY J. · 2020 to 2020
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL140971NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL140971NIGMS NIH HHS S10OD028717NIH HHS S10 OD028717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples are rich in biomolecules, including proteins, and useful for molecular studies of lung health and disease. However, mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic analysis of BALF is challenged by the dynamic range of protein abundance, and potential for interfering contaminants. A robust, MS-based proteomics compatible sample preparation workflow for BALF samples, including those of small and large volume, would be useful for many researchers.

resultsWe have developed a workflow that combines high abundance protein depletion, protein trapping, clean-up, and in-situ tryptic digestion, that is compatible with either qualitative or quantitative MS-based proteomic analysis. The workflow includes a value-added collection of endogenous peptides for peptidomic analysis of BALF samples, if desired, as well as amenability to offline semi-preparative or microscale fractionation of complex peptide mixtures prior to LC-MS/MS analysis, for increased depth of analysis. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this workflow on BALF samples collected from COPD patients, including for smaller sample volumes of 1-5 mL that are commonly available from the clinic. We also demonstrate the repeatability of the workflow as an indicator of its utility for quantitative proteomic studies.

conclusionsOverall, our described workflow consistently provided high quality proteins and tryptic peptides for MS analysis. It should enable researchers to apply MS-based proteomics to a wide-variety of studies focused on BALF clinical specimens.

Indexed as

BALFBronchoalveolar lavage fluidLung diseaseMass spectrometryQuantitative proteomicsSample preparation

Identifiers

PMID37005570
PMCPMC10068177
OpenAlexW4362506688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.