ArticleScientific reports2023
An integrative machine learning framework for classifying SEER breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- UbiQTree: Uncertainty quantification in XAI with tree ensembles.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Impact of surgical approach and survival prediction of malignant phyllode tumor by machine learning.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence based Scheme for Breast Cancer Detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of parametric survival models and machine learning methods in breast cancer prognosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prognostic factors analysis and nomogram construction of breast cancer patients lung metastases and bone metastases.Surgery open science · 2025Article
- A machine learning-based risk prediction model for diabetic oral ulceration.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Article
- Mortality Prediction Modeling for Patients with Breast Cancer Based on Explainable Machine Learning.Cancers · 2024Article
- A Modified LeNet CNN for Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Ultrasound Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the commonest type of cancer in women worldwide and the leading cause of mortality for females. The aim of this research is to classify the alive and death status of breast cancer patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. Due to its capacity to handle enormous data sets systematically, machine learning and deep learning has been widely employed in biomedical research to answer diverse classification difficulties. Pre-processing the data enables its visualization and analysis for use in making important decisions. This research presents a feasible machine learning-based approach for categorizing SEER breast cancer dataset. Moreover, a two-step feature selection method based on Variance Threshold and Principal Component Analysis was employed to select the features from the SEER breast cancer dataset. After selecting the features, the classification of the breast cancer dataset is carried out using Supervised and Ensemble learning techniques such as Ada Boosting, XG Boosting, Gradient Boosting, Naive Bayes and Decision Tree. Utilizing the train-test split and k-fold cross-validation approaches, the performance of various machine learning algorithms is examined. The accuracy of Decision Tree for both train-test split and cross validation achieved as 98%. In this study, it is observed that the Decision Tree algorithm outperforms other supervised and ensemble learning approaches for the SEER Breast Cancer dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.