Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37005484›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

An integrative machine learning framework for classifying SEER breast cancer.

P Manikandan, U Durga, C Ponnuraja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P ManikandanDepartment of Data Science, Loyola College, Chennai, 600 034, India. manimkn89@gmail.com.
U DurgaDepartment of Data Science, Loyola College, Chennai, 600 034, India.
C PonnurajaICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, 600 031, India. cponnuraja@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the commonest type of cancer in women worldwide and the leading cause of mortality for females. The aim of this research is to classify the alive and death status of breast cancer patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. Due to its capacity to handle enormous data sets systematically, machine learning and deep learning has been widely employed in biomedical research to answer diverse classification difficulties. Pre-processing the data enables its visualization and analysis for use in making important decisions. This research presents a feasible machine learning-based approach for categorizing SEER breast cancer dataset. Moreover, a two-step feature selection method based on Variance Threshold and Principal Component Analysis was employed to select the features from the SEER breast cancer dataset. After selecting the features, the classification of the breast cancer dataset is carried out using Supervised and Ensemble learning techniques such as Ada Boosting, XG Boosting, Gradient Boosting, Naive Bayes and Decision Tree. Utilizing the train-test split and k-fold cross-validation approaches, the performance of various machine learning algorithms is examined. The accuracy of Decision Tree for both train-test split and cross validation achieved as 98%. In this study, it is observed that the Decision Tree algorithm outperforms other supervised and ensemble learning approaches for the SEER Breast Cancer dataset.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMachine LearningSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID37005484
PMCPMC10067827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.