Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37005445›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The immune cell landscape and response of Marek's disease resistant and susceptible chickens infected with Marek's disease virus.

Wesley C Warren, Edward S Rice, Ashley Meyer, Cari J Hearn, Alec Steep, Henry D Hunt, Melissa S Monson, Susan J Lamont, Hans H Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. ExploitingFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Thioredoxin Domain Containing 5 (TXNDC5): Friend or Foe?Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Wesley C WarrenDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. warrenwc@missouri.edu.
Edward S RiceDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Ashley MeyerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Cari J HearnAvian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, USDA, ARS, USNPRC, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Alec SteepDepartment of Human Genetics Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Henry D HuntAvian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, USDA, ARS, USNPRC, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Melissa S MonsonDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Susan J LamontDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Hans H ChengAvian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, USDA, ARS, USNPRC, East Lansing, MI, USA. hans.cheng@usda.gov.
Agricultural Research Service · USUniversity of Missouri · USIowa State University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USU.S. National Poultry Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically resistant or susceptible chickens to Marek's disease (MD) have been widely used models to identify the molecular determinants of these phenotypes. However, these prior studies lacked the basic identification and understanding of immune cell types that could be translated toward improved MD control. To gain insights into specific immune cell types and their responses to Marek's disease virus (MDV) infection, we used single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) on splenic cells from MD resistant and susceptible birds. In total, 14,378 cells formed clusters that identified various immune cell types. Lymphocytes, specifically T cell subtypes, were the most abundant with significant proportional changes in some subtypes upon infection. The largest number of differentially expressed genes (DEG) response was seen in granulocytes, while macrophage DEGs differed in directionality by subtype and line. Among the most DEG in almost all immune cell types were granzyme and granulysin, both associated with cell-perforating processes. Protein interactive network analyses revealed multiple overlapping canonical pathways within both lymphoid and myeloid cell lineages. This initial estimation of the chicken immune cell type landscape and its accompanying response will greatly aid efforts in identifying specific cell types and improving our knowledge of host response to viral infection.

Indexed as

Herpesvirus 2, GallidMarek DiseaseAnimalsChickensDisease SusceptibilitySpleen

Identifiers

PMID37005445
PMCPMC10067856
OpenAlexW4362521039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.