Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37005365›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2023

Real-World Effectiveness of Primary Series and Booster Doses of Inactivated Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Against Omicron BA.2 Variant Infection in China: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Lin Tang, Fu-Zhen Wang, Lance E Rodewald, Xuan-Yi Wang, Si-Yu Liu, Qian-Qian Liu, Xiao-Qi Wang, Dan Wu, Ming-Shuang Li, Qian Zhang and 20 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Lin TangNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Fu-Zhen WangNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Lance E RodewaldNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Xuan-Yi WangShanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology of Ministry of Education and Ministry of Health, and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai.
Si-Yu LiuNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Qian-Qian LiuNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Xiao-Qi WangNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Dan WuNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Ming-Shuang LiNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Qian ZhangNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Yi-Ming ShaoState Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Li-Fang HuangNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Yu-Dan SongNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Yong HuangNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Xiang ZengNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Li-Jun LiuNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Hong YangNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Ao-Di HuangNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Li-Ming BaoNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Hui ZhengNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Chao MaNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Xiao-Ya LvDevelopment Center for Medicine and Science and Technology, National Health Commission, Beijing.
Lei SongDevelopment Center for Medicine and Science and Technology, National Health Commission, Beijing.
Zhao MaDevelopment Center for Medicine and Science and Technology, National Health Commission, Beijing.
Shu-Guang WangDevelopment Center for Medicine and Science and Technology, National Health Commission, Beijing.
Hao MaDevelopment Center for Medicine and Science and Technology, National Health Commission, Beijing.
Wei-Jie GuanGuangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhi-Yin WuDevelopment Center for Medicine and Science and Technology, National Health Commission, Beijing.
Nan-Shan ZhongGuangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zun-Dong YinNational Immunization Program, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing.
Center for Disease Control · TWChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · USFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNFudan University · CNGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChina has been using inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines as primary series and booster doses to protect the population from severe to fatal COVID-19. We evaluated primary and booster vaccine effectiveness (VE) against Omicron BA.2 infection outcomes.

methodsThis was a 13-province retrospective cohort study of quarantined close contacts of BA.2-infected individuals. Outcomes were BA.2 infection, COVID-19 pneumonia or worse, and severe/critical COVID-19. Absolute VE was estimated by comparison with an unvaccinated group.

resultsThere were 289 427 close contacts ≥3 years old exposed to Omicron BA.2 cases; 31 831 turned nucleic acid amplification test-positive during quarantine, 97.2% with mild or asymptomatic infection, 2.6% with COVID-19 pneumonia, and 0.15% with severe/critical COVID-19. None died. Adjusted VE (aVE) against any infection was 17% for primary series and 22% when boosted. Primary series aVE in adults >18 years was 66% against COVID-19 pneumonia or worse and 91% against severe/critical COVID-19. Booster dose aVE was 74% against pneumonia or worse, and 93% against severe/critical COVID-19.

conclusionsInactivated COVID-19 vaccines provided modest protection from infection, very good protection against pneumonia, and excellent protection against severe/critical COVID-19. Booster doses are necessary to provide strongest protection.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultAsymptomatic InfectionsChild, PreschoolChinaHumansRetrospective StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesChinahomologous and heterologous boosterinactivated COVID-19 vaccinesvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID37005365
PMCPMC10420401
OpenAlexW4362506446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.