ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2023
Universal genetic testing for women with newly diagnosed breast cancer in the context of multidisciplinary team care.
Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Measures for Individuals Who Underwent Genetic Testing for Heritable Cancer.The patient · 2026Pooled it
- Recent advances in non-pharmacological interventions for symptom burden management in breast cancer patients treated with ovarian function suppression.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Short-term Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy for Patients at a High Risk for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of germline genetic testing for breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of mainstream genetic testing for breast cancer patients: five-year data from the Parkville Familial Cancer Centre.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Genetic Testing Uptake Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Exploring Traditional Breast Cancer Risk Genes Among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prevalence and clinical significance of germline pathogenic variants identified by multigene panel testing in high-risk Japanese patients with breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Breast cancer patients' experiences and outcomes of mainstream genetic testing with and without genetic counseling.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Using patient-reported outcomes from the PROCLAIM trial to assess the impact of universal germline genetic testing for prostate cancer patients.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Germline Genetic Testing in Breast and Gynecologic Cancers: Evaluating Age at Diagnosis as a Determinant.Cancers · 2026Article
- Integrating breast tumour homologous recombination deficiency status to aid germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant classification.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Quality of life, anxiety and cancer worry following hereditary cancer testing: a 6-month Swedish follow-up study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Screening, Risk Reduction Strategies, and Clinical Management of Unaffected Carriers ofWorld journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Breast cancers arising in high mammographic density tissue harbor tumor-promoting immune profiles.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Advancing Germline Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer in Resource-Restricted Settings: Evidence, Barriers, and a Practical Roadmap for Implementation.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- The association of race and ethnicity with risk-reducing mastectomies in patients with non-BRCA mutations.American journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Universal vs. ASCO guidelines-based germline genetic testing for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in resource-restricted settings.Oncology reviews · 2025Article
- Reduced Breast and Ovarian Cancer Through Targeted Genetic Testing: Estimates Using the NEEMO Microsimulation Model.Cancers · 2024Article
- Screening guidelines for individuals at increased risk for prostate cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the feasibility of universal genetic testing of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, to estimate the incidence of pathogenic gene variants and their impact on patient management, and to evaluate patient and clinician acceptance of universal testing. DESIGN, SETTING,
participantsProspective study of women with invasive or high grade in situ breast cancer and unknown germline status discussed at the Parkville Breast Service (Melbourne) multidisciplinary team meeting. Women were recruited to the pilot (12 June 2020 - 22 March 2021) and expansion phases (17 October 2021 - 8 November 2022) of the Mutational Assessment of newly diagnosed breast cancer using Germline and tumour genomICs (MAGIC) study.
main outcome measuresGermline testing by DNA sequencing, filtered for nineteen hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes that could be classified as actionable; only pathogenic variants were reported. Surveys before and after genetic testing assessed pilot phase participants' perceptions of genetic testing, and psychological distress and cancer-specific worry. A separate survey assessed clinicians' views on universal testing.
resultsPathogenic germline variants were identified in 31 of 474 expanded study phase participants (6.5%), including 28 of 429 women with invasive breast cancer (6.5%). Eighteen of the 31 did not meet current genetic testing eligibility guidelines (probability of a germline pathogenic variant ≥ 10%, based on CanRisk, or Manchester score ≥ 15). Clinical management was changed for 24 of 31 women after identification of a pathogenic variant. Including 68 further women who underwent genetic testing outside the study, 44 of 542 women carried pathogenic variants (8.1%). Acceptance of universal testing was high among both patients (90 of 103, 87%) and clinicians; no decision regret or adverse impact on psychological distress or cancer-specific worry were reported.
conclusionUniversal genetic testing following the diagnosis of breast cancer detects clinically significant germline pathogenic variants that might otherwise be missed because of testing guidelines. Routine testing and reporting of pathogenic variants is feasible and acceptable for both patients and clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.