Trial reportPharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2023
Impaired inhibition after delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in women not related to circulating estradiol levels.
Trial report in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on computational measures of neurocognitive processes are related to recent cannabis use among adolescents and young adults.Frontiers in adolescent medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cannabis and its main psychoactive constituent, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), impair cognitive processes, including the ability to inhibit inappropriate responses. However, responses to cannabinoid drugs vary widely, and little is known about the factors that influence the risk for adverse effects. One potential source of variation in response to cannabinoids in women is circulating ovarian hormones such as estradiol and progesterone. Whereas there is some evidence that estradiol affects responses to cannabinoids in rodents, little is known about such interactions in humans. Here, we investigate whether variations in estradiol levels across the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle modulate the effect of THC on inhibitory control in healthy women. Healthy female occasional cannabis users (N = 60) received THC (7.5 mg and 15 mg, oral) and placebo during either the early follicular phase, when estradiol levels are low, or the late follicular phase, when estradiol levels are higher. They completed a Go/No Go (GNG) task at the time of peak drug effect. We hypothesized that the effects of THC on GNG performance would be greater when estradiol levels were elevated. As expected, THC impaired GNG task performance: it increased response time and errors of commission/false alarms and decreased accuracy, relative to placebo. However, these impairments were not related to estradiol levels. These results suggest that THC-induced impairments in inhibitory control are not affected by cycle-related fluctuations in estradiol levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.