Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37004727›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

Epistasis decreases with increasing antibiotic pressure but not temperature.

Ana-Hermina Ghenu, André Amado, Isabel Gordo, Claudia Bank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Interdisciplinary approaches to predicting evolutionary biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Epistasis decreases with increasing antibiotic pressure but not temperature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana-Hermina GhenuInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, Oeiras 2780-156, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9088-2232
André AmadoDivision of Theoretical Ecology and Evolution, Institut für Ökologie und Evolution, Universität Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9027-5037
Isabel GordoInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, Oeiras 2780-156, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1622-5143
Claudia BankInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, Oeiras 2780-156, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4730-758X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting mutational effects is essential for the control of antibiotic resistance (ABR). Predictions are difficult when there are strong genotype-by-environment (G × E), gene-by-gene (G × G or epistatic) or gene-by-gene-by-environment (G × G × E) interactions. We quantified G × G × E effects in

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEpistasis, GeneticEscherichia coliGenetic FitnessGenotypeMutationTemperatureAnti-Bacterial Agentscryptic epistasisenvironmental interactionsgenetic interactionsrifampicinRNA polymerase B (rpoB)

Identifiers

PMID37004727
PMCPMC10067269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.