ArticleCJEM2023
Definitions and factors associated with emergency physician productivity: a scoping review.
Article in CJEM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- How productive emergency physicians work: a qualitative interview study of clinical workflow in the emergency department.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- [Survey of staffing structures and equipment in 176 German emergency departments].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Article
- Defining and Measuring Emergency Physician Productivity: Development of a Consensus-Based Productivity Index.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- Resident clinical dashboards to support precision education in emergency medicine.AEM education and training · 2025Review
- Productivity and Efficiency Growth During Emergency Medicine Residency Training.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- A novel approach to measuring emergency physician efficiency.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere currently exists no standard productivity measure for emergency physicians. The objectives of this scoping review were to synthesize the literature to identify components of definitions and measurements of emergency physician productivity and to evaluate factors associated with productivity.
methodsWe searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and ProQuest One Business from inception to May 2022. We included all studies that reported on emergency physician productivity. We excluded studies that only reported departmental productivity, studies with non-emergency providers, review articles, case reports, and editorials. Data were extracted into predefined worksheets and a descriptive summary was presented. Quality analysis was performed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
resultsAfter screening 5521 studies, 44 studies met full inclusion criteria. Components of the definition for emergency physician productivity included: number of patients managed, revenue generated, patient processing time, and a standardization factor. Most studies measured productivity using patients per hour, relative value units per hour, and provider-to-disposition time. The most studied factors influencing productivity included scribes, resident learners, electronic medical record implementation, and faculty teaching scores.
conclusionEmergency physician productivity is heterogeneously defined, but includes common elements such as patient volume, complexity, and processing time. Commonly reported productivity metrics include patients per hour and relative value units that incorporate patient volume and complexity, respectively. The findings of this scoping review can guide ED physicians and administrators to measure the impact of QI initiatives, promote efficient patient care, and optimize physician staffing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37004680What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.