Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37004679›Full record

ArticleCJEM2023

A value-based comparison of the management of respiratory diseases in walk-in clinics and emergency departments.

Tania Marx, Lynne Moore, Denis Talbot, Jason R Guertin, Philippe Lachapelle, Sébastien Blais, Narcisse Singbo, David Simonyan, Jeanne Lavallée, Nawid Zada and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CJEM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tania MarxAxe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Sante, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1443-9423
Lynne MooreAxe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Sante, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Denis TalbotDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Jason R GuertinAxe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Sante, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Philippe LachapelleClinical and Organizational Performance Department of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Sébastien BlaisClinical and Organizational Performance Department of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Narcisse SingboAxe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Sante, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
David SimonyanAxe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Sante, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Jeanne LavalléeAxe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Sante, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Nawid ZadaAxe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Sante, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Shaghayegh ShahrigharahkoshanAxe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Sante, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Benoit HuardAxe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Sante, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Pascale OlivierAxe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Sante, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Myriam MalletAxe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Sante, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Mélanie LétourneauClinical and Organizational Performance Department of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Michel LafrenièreClinique La Cité Médicale, Québec, QC, Canada.
Patrick M ArchambaultDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Simon BerthelotAxe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Sante, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada. simon.berthelot@fmed.ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0372-0586
Université Laval · CACentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches · CALa Cité Médicale · CAThe Quebec Population Health Research Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur aim was to compare some of the health outcomes and costs associated with value of care in emergency departments (ED) and walk-in clinics for ambulatory patients presenting with an acute respiratory disease.

methodsA health records review was conducted from April 2016 through March 2017 in one ED and one walk-in clinic. Inclusion criteria were: (i) ambulatory patients at least 18 years old, (ii) discharged home with a diagnosis of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), pneumonia, acute asthma, or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients returning to any ED or walk-in clinic within three and seven days of the index visit. Secondary outcomes were the mean cost of care and the incidence of antibiotic prescription for URTI patients. The cost of care was estimated from the Ministry of Health's perspectives using time-driven activity-based costing.

resultsThe ED group included 170 patients and the walk-in clinic group 326 patients. The return visit incidences at three and seven days were, respectively, 25.9% and 38.2% in the ED vs. 4.9% and 14.7% in the walk-in clinic (adjusted relative risk (arr) of 4.7 (95% CI 2.6-8.6) and 2.7 (1.9-3.9)). The mean cost ($Cdn) of the index visit care was 116.0 (106.3-125.7) in the ED vs. 62.5 (57.7-67.3) in the walk-in clinic (mean difference of 56.4 (45.7-67.1)). Antibiotic prescription for URTI was 5.6% in the ED vs. 24.7% in the walk-in clinic (arr 0.2, 0.01-0.6).

conclusionsThis study is the first in a larger research program to compare the value of care between walk-in clinics and the ED. The potential advantages of walk-in clinics over EDs (lower costs, lower incidence of return visits) for ambulatory patients with respiratory diseases should be considered in healthcare planning.

Indexed as

AsthmaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdolescentEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPatient DischargeCost of careEmergency departmentHealth outcomesOutpatient visitRespiratory diseasesReturn visitsValue of care

Identifiers

PMID37004679
OpenAlexW4362507037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.