Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37004646›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023

SlicerCBM: automatic framework for biomechanical analysis of the brain.

Saima Safdar, Benjamin F Zwick, Yue Yu, George C Bourantas, Grand R Joldes, Simon K Warfield, Damon E Hyde, Sarah Frisken, Tina Kapur, Ron Kikinis and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Saima SafdarIntelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA, Australia. saima.safdar@research.uwa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5994-061X
Benjamin F ZwickIntelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA, Australia.
Yue YuIntelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA, Australia.
George C BourantasIntelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA, Australia.
Grand R JoldesIntelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA, Australia.
Simon K WarfieldComputational Radiology Laboratory, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Damon E HydeComputational Radiology Laboratory, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah FriskenBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Tina KapurBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ron KikinisBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Alexandra GolbyBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Arya NabaviDepartment of Neurosurgery, KRH Klinikum Nordstadt, Hannover, Germany.
Adam WittekIntelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA, Australia.
Karol MillerIntelligent Systems for Medicine Laboratory, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015902 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIKINIS, RON, WESTIN, CARL-FREDRIK · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
TRD 3 - Enabling Technologies for Intraprocedural GuidanceP41EB028741 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Nobuhiko Hata, CLARE M TEMPANY · 2021 to 2026
$10.7M
Genetic Analysis and Manipulation Core (GAEC)P50HD105351 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SCOTT Loren POMEROY, MUSTAFA SAHIN · 2021 to 2026
$9.4M
Lymph Node Quantification System for Multisite Clinical TrialsR01CA235589 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GORDON J HARRIS, Ron Kikinis · 2019 to 2026
$4.5M
Ultrasound based neurosurgical navigation with uncertainty visualizationR01EB032387 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FRISKEN, SARAH, GOLBY, ALEXANDRA J · 2022 to 2025
$2.0M
Continuous Compensation of Brain Shift during NeurosurgeryR01EB027134 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FRISKEN, SARAH · 2018 to 2021
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003INCI NIH HHS R01 CA235589NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015902NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028741NIBIB NIH HHS P41EB028741NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027134NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032387NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBrain shift that occurs during neurosurgery disturbs the brain's anatomy. Prediction of the brain shift is essential for accurate localisation of the surgical target. Biomechanical models have been envisaged as a possible tool for such predictions. In this study, we created a framework to automate the workflow for predicting intra-operative brain deformations.

methodsWe created our framework by uniquely combining our meshless total Lagrangian explicit dynamics (MTLED) algorithm for computing soft tissue deformations, open-source software libraries and built-in functions within 3D Slicer, an open-source software package widely used for medical research. Our framework generates the biomechanical brain model from the pre-operative MRI, computes brain deformation using MTLED and outputs results in the form of predicted warped intra-operative MRI.

resultsOur framework is used to solve three different neurosurgical brain shift scenarios: craniotomy, tumour resection and electrode placement. We evaluated our framework using nine patients. The average time to construct a patient-specific brain biomechanical model was 3 min, and that to compute deformations ranged from 13 to 23 min. We performed a qualitative evaluation by comparing our predicted intra-operative MRI with the actual intra-operative MRI. For quantitative evaluation, we computed Hausdorff distances between predicted and actual intra-operative ventricle surfaces. For patients with craniotomy and tumour resection, approximately 95% of the nodes on the ventricle surfaces are within two times the original in-plane resolution of the actual surface determined from the intra-operative MRI.

conclusionOur framework provides a broader application of existing solution methods not only in research but also in clinics. We successfully demonstrated the application of our framework by predicting intra-operative deformations in nine patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures.

Indexed as

BrainBrain NeoplasmsCraniotomyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurosurgical ProceduresBiomechanicsBrain deformationBrain shiftFramework

Identifiers

PMID37004646
PMCPMC10497672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.