Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37004591›Full record

ReviewJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2023

In vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models for dental pulp regeneration.

Sofia Silvia Piglionico, Coline Pons, Olivier Romieu, Frédéric Cuisinier, Bernard Levallois, Ivan Vladislavov Panayotov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cell homing within endodontic hydrogels: A scoping review.The Japanese dental science review · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sofia Silvia PiglionicoLBN, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France. sofiapiglionico@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1269-3484
Coline PonsLBN, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Olivier RomieuLBN, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Frédéric CuisinierLBN, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Bernard LevalloisLBN, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Ivan Vladislavov PanayotovLBN, Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Université de Montpellier · FRUniversidad Nacional de Cuyo · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the concept of tissue engineering (Cells-Scaffold-Bioactive molecules), regenerative endodontics appeared as a new notion for dental endodontic treatment. Its approaches aim to preserve dental pulp vitality (pulp capping) or to regenerate a vascularized pulp-like tissue inside necrotic root canals by cell homing. To improve the methods of tissue engineering for pulp regeneration, numerous studies using in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models have been performed. This review explores the evolution of laboratory models used in such studies and classifies them according to different criteria. It starts from the initial two-dimensional in vitro models that allowed characterization of stem cell behavior, through 3D culture matrices combined with dental tissue and finally arrives at the more challenging ex vivo and in vivo models. The travel which follows the elaboration of such models reveals the difficulty in establishing reproducible laboratory models for dental pulp regeneration. The development of well-established protocols and new laboratory ex vivo and in vivo models in the field of pulp regeneration would lead to consistent results, reduction of animal experimentation, and facilitation of the translation to clinical practice.

Indexed as

Dental PulpRegenerationAnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesStem CellsTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID37004591
PMCPMC10067643
OpenAlexW4362522137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.