ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Boolean network sketches: a unifying framework for logical model inference.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- From prior knowledge to data-informed models: a review of Boolean network inference.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Control-guided refinement of partially specified Boolean networks: applications to RTK signaling.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Sketchbook: logical model inference from Boolean network sketches.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Data-driven inference of Boolean networks from transcriptomes to predict cellular differentiation and reprogramming.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Review
- Evaluating changes in attractor sets under small network perturbations to infer reliable microbial interaction networks from abundance patterns.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Advances in modeling cellular state dynamics: integrating omics data and predictive techniques.Animal cells and systems · 2025Review
- Maboss for HPC environments: implementations of the continuous time Boolean model simulator for large CPU clusters and GPU accelerators.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- LogicGep: Boolean networks inference using symbolic regression from time-series transcriptomic profiling data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- SAILoR: Structure-Aware Inference of Logic Rules.PloS one · 2024Article
- Modularity of biological systems: a link between structure and function.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationThe problem of model inference is of fundamental importance to systems biology. Logical models (e.g. Boolean networks; BNs) represent a computationally attractive approach capable of handling large biological networks. The models are typically inferred from experimental data. However, even with a substantial amount of experimental data supported by some prior knowledge, existing inference methods often focus on a small sample of admissible candidate models only.
resultsWe propose Boolean network sketches as a new formal instrument for the inference of Boolean networks. A sketch integrates (typically partial) knowledge about the network's topology and the update logic (obtained through, e.g. a biological knowledge base or a literature search), as well as further assumptions about the properties of the network's transitions (e.g. the form of its attractor landscape), and additional restrictions on the model dynamics given by the measured experimental data. Our new BNs inference algorithm starts with an 'initial' sketch, which is extended by adding restrictions representing experimental data to a 'data-informed' sketch and subsequently computes all BNs consistent with the data-informed sketch. Our algorithm is based on a symbolic representation and coloured model-checking. Our approach is unique in its ability to cover a broad spectrum of knowledge and efficiently produce a compact representation of all inferred BNs. We evaluate the method on a non-trivial collection of real-world and simulated data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All software and data are freely available as a reproducible artefact at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7688740.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.