Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37004123›Full record

ReviewBMC psychology2023

Psychological distress is more common in some occupations and increases with job tenure: a thirty-seven year panel study in the United States.

James N Laditka, Sarah B Laditka, Ahmed A Arif, Oluwaseun J Adeyemi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cortisol-CXFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Navigating the skies: a cross-sectional study of depression among Saudi Arabian airline pilots.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James N LaditkaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.
Sarah B LaditkaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA. sladitka@uncc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2089-0787
Ahmed A ArifDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0237-9937
Oluwaseun J AdeyemiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 1st Avenue, New York City, NY, 10016, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7287-970X

Funding

HRSA HHS U1CRH30041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorkers in certain occupations may have elevated risks of psychological distress. However, research is limited. For example, researchers often measure distress that may have existed before occupational exposures. We studied occupations and the development of psychological distress using national data from the United States.

methodsWe reviewed relevant research to identify occupations with low and high risks of mental health problems. We confirmed those individual low and high risk occupations using 1981-2017 data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (n = 24,789). We measured new cases of distress using the Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (Kessler K6) and compared distress in the low and high risk groups, adjusted for factors associated with occupational selection and non-occupational distress risks. A subset of participants described their jobs (n = 1,484), including factors such as job demands, social support, and control over work. We examined associations of those factors with psychological distress.

resultsWorkers in high risk occupations had 20% higher adjusted odds of developing distress than those in low risk occupations (odds ratio, OR 1.20, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.13-1.28). Distress increased with time in a high risk occupation: ≥5 years OR 1.38 (CI 1.18-1.62), ≥ 10 years OR 1.46 (CI 1.07-1.99), and ≥ 15 years OR 1.77 (CI 1.08-2.90; p-trend = 0.0145). The most common positive participant descriptions of their jobs indicated social support (34%), sense of accomplishment (17%), and control over work (15%). Participants reporting such descriptions were significantly less likely to have a high risk occupation (OR 0.66, CI 0.46-0.94, p = 0.0195). The most common negative descriptions were excessive job demands (43%), low social support (27%), and lack of control (14%). Participants reporting such descriptions were significantly more likely to have a high risk occupation (OR 1.49, CI 1.03-2.14, p = 0.0331).

conclusionCertain occupations may have high risks of psychological distress, which may be due to characteristics of the occupations rather than employee characteristics, or in addition to them. Results were consistent with theoretical models of psychosocial work environments. Providers of health care and social services should ask patients or clients about work-related distress.

Indexed as

OccupationsPsychological DistressHumansIncomeSocial SupportStress, PsychologicalUnited StatesAnxietyDepressionMental healthOccupational healthPsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID37004123
PMCPMC10064628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.