Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37004097›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2023

Safety of Simparica Trio

Sheerin Mathur, Phyllis B Malpas, Sean Mahabir, Joseph Boucher, Aleah Pullins, Genevieve Gagnon, Tom L McTier, Steven Maeder

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheerin MathurZoetis, Veterinary Medicine Research and Development, Michigan, 49007, USA. sheerin.mathur@zoetis.com.
Phyllis B MalpasZoetis, Veterinary Medicine Research and Development, Michigan, 49007, USA.
Sean MahabirZoetis, Veterinary Medicine Research and Development, Michigan, 49007, USA.
Joseph BoucherZoetis, Veterinary Medicine Research and Development, Michigan, 49007, USA.
Aleah PullinsZoetis, Veterinary Medicine Research and Development, Michigan, 49007, USA.
Genevieve GagnonZoetis, Veterinary Medicine Research and Development, Michigan, 49007, USA.
Tom L McTierZoetis, Veterinary Medicine Research and Development, Michigan, 49007, USA.
Steven MaederZoetis, Veterinary Medicine Research and Development, Michigan, 49007, USA.
Zoetis (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of the safety of heartworm preventatives in dogs with pre-existing patent heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) infections is necessary because rapid adult worm and microfilarial death can lead to severe clinical complications, including thromboembolism and anaphylactic shock in dogs. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical safety of Simparica Trio

methodsTwenty-four laboratory Beagle dogs were implanted with 10 male and 10 female D. immitis (ZoeKY isolate), and once infection was patent, they were randomized equally among three groups to receive no treatment, 1× or 3× the maximum recommended label dose of Simparica Trio. Dogs in the treated groups received Simparica Trio on days 0, 28 and 56. In-life assessments included body weight, physical examinations, clinical observations, daily general health observations, a quantitative estimate of food consumption and blood collections for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis, microfilariae (MF) counts and D. immitis antigen testing. At the end of the study the heart, lungs and pleural and peritoneal cavities were examined for adult D. immitis worms.

resultsSimparica Trio was generally well tolerated. Emesis occurred at low frequency in all groups including control. Abnormal stool occurred occasionally in the 1× and 3× groups throughout the 3-month study. Fever (> 104 °F/40 °C) was recorded in one 1× and one 3× dog 1 day after the first dose and resolved by the following day. No severe hypersensitivity reactions occurred. The mean number of circulating microfilariae (MF) counts in the control group increased from 12,000/ml at study start (Day 0) to > 20,000/ml at Day 28 and remained > 20,000/ml for the duration of the study. The least squares means of circulating MF were reduced by 69.8% on Day 1 and 97.4% on Day 7 for the 1× group and remained at > 99% lower than the control group for the remainder of the study. Similarly, least squares means of circulating MF were reduced by 85.3% on Day 1 and 93.9% on Day 7 for the 3× group and remained > 98% lower than the control group for the remainder of the study. At the end of the study, the mean number of implanted adult worms recovered was < 10 per sex in all groups with 90%, 85% and 75% of live adult heartworms recovered in control, 1× and 3× treatment groups, respectively. Low numbers of dead adult worms were recovered in 1× and 3×, with none in control. Following each dose, the moxidectin and sarolaner AUC and C

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that Simparica Trio (sarolaner, pyrantel, moxidectin) was well tolerated when administered to heartworm-positive dogs at 1× and 3× the maximum recommended dose at 28-day intervals for 3 consecutive months. Simparica Trio significantly reduced microfilaria counts in both treatment groups, without significant clinical consequences. At the doses administered, Simparica Trio had minor adulticidal activity but resulted in no clinical sequelae.

Indexed as

Dirofilaria immitisDirofilariasisDog DiseasesAdministration, OralAnimalsAzetidinesDogsFemaleMacrolidesMaleMicrofilariaePyrantelSpiro CompoundsTreatment OutcomeAzetidinesMacrolidesmoxidectinPyrantelsarolanerSpiro CompoundsDirofilaria immitisDogsHeartworm diseaseMicrofilaremiaMoxidectinPharmacokineticsPKSafetySimparica Trio

Identifiers

PMID37004097
PMCPMC10064668
OpenAlexW4362520774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.