ArticlePatient safety in surgery2023
Factors contributing to preventing operating room "never events": a machine learning analysis.
Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The safety of radiofrequency surgical sponges in orthopedic surgery: a validation study in 2,251 arthroplasty procedures.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction model for surgical site infections after major abdominal surgery.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Article
- Root causes of surgical never-events: a systematic review.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and robotic technologies redefining precision and personalization in orthopedic surgery: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.MedComm · 2025Review
- Wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and retained foreign object events in out-of-hospital settings: analysis of closed medico-legal complaints in Canada (2012-2021).Patient safety in surgery · 2025Article
- Machine learning approaches for improvement of patient safety in surgery.Patient safety in surgery · 2024Article
- Influence of a surgeon's exposure to operating room turnover delays on patient outcomes.BJS open · 2024Observational
- Unintentionally retained lap sponge mimicking an ovarian cyst two years after Caesarean section in a 37-year old patient: case report of a rare "never event" in Sudan.Patient safety in surgery · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence model for automated surgical instrument detection and counting: an experimental proof-of-concept study.Patient safety in surgery · 2024Article
- Minimization of occurrence of retained surgical items using machine learning and deep learning techniques: a review.BioData mining · 2024Review
- The value of machine learning technology and artificial intelligence to enhance patient safety in spine surgery: a review.Patient safety in surgery · 2024Review
- Operating room organization and surgical performance: a systematic review.Patient safety in surgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA surgical "Never Event" is a preventable error occurring immediately before, during or immediately following surgery. Various factors contribute to the occurrence of major Never Events, but little is known about their quantified risk in relation to a surgery's characteristics. Our study uses machine learning to reveal and quantify risk factors with the goal of improving patient safety and quality of care.
methodsWe used data from 9,234 observations on safety standards and 101 root-cause analyses from actual, major "Never Events" including wrong site surgery and retained foreign item, and three random forest supervised machine learning models to identify risk factors. Using a standard 10-cross validation technique, we evaluated the models' metrics, measuring their impact on the occurrence of the two types of Never Events through Gini impurity.
resultsWe identified 24 contributing factors in six surgical departments: two had an impact of > 900% in Urology, Orthopedics, and General Surgery; six had an impact of 0-900% in Gynecology, Urology, and Cardiology; and 17 had an impact of < 0%. Combining factors revealed 15-20 pairs with an increased probability in five departments: Gynecology, 875-1900%; Urology, 1900-2600%; Cardiology, 833-1500%; Orthopedics,1825-4225%; and General Surgery, 2720-13,600%. Five factors affected wrong site surgery's occurrence (-60.96 to 503.92%) and five affected retained foreign body (-74.65 to 151.43%): two nurses (66.26-87.92%), surgery length < 1 h (85.56-122.91%), and surgery length 1-2 h (-60.96 to 85.56%).
conclusionsUsing machine learning, we could quantify the risk factors' potential impact on wrong site surgeries and retained foreign items in relation to a surgery's characteristics, suggesting that safety standards should be adjusted to surgery's characteristics based on risk assessment in each operating room. . TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: MOH 032-2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.