Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37004075›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2023

Specific interpretation biases as a function of social anxiety and callous-unemotional traits in a community and a clinical adolescent sample.

Anna L Dapprich, Eni S Becker, Laura M Derks, Tanja Legenbauer, Wolf-Gero Lange

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna L DapprichBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. anna.dapprich@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2208-698X
Eni S BeckerBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-426X
Laura M DerksBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-0618
Tanja LegenbauerLWL-University Hospital Hamm for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1580-9991
Wolf-Gero LangeBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4236-0819
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLLWL-Universitätsklinik Hamm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThreatening and hostile interpretation biases are seen as causal and maintaining mechanisms of childhood anxiety and aggression, respectively. However, it is unclear whether these interpretation biases are specific to distinct problems or whether they are general psychopathological phenomena. The specificity versus pervasiveness of interpretation biases could also differ depending on mental health status. Therefore, in the current study, we investigated whether social anxiety and callous-unemotional (CU) traits were uniquely related to threatening and hostile interpretation biases, respectively, in both a community and a clinical sample of adolescents.

methodsA total of 161 adolescents between 10 to 15 years of age participated. The community sample consisted of 88 participants and the clinical sample consisted of 73 inpatients with a variety of psychological disorders. Social anxiety and CU-traits were assessed with self-report questionnaires. The Ambiguous Social Scenario Task was used to measure both threatening and hostile interpretations in response to written vignettes.

resultsResults showed that social anxiety was uniquely related to more threatening interpretations, while CU-traits were uniquely related to more hostile interpretations. These relationships were replicated for the community sample. For the clinical sample, only the link between social anxiety and threatening interpretations was significant. Explorative analyses showed that adolescents with externalizing disorders scored higher on hostile interpretations than adolescents with internalizing disorders.

conclusionsOverall, these results support the content-specificity of threatening interpretation biases in social anxiety and of hostile interpretation biases in CU-traits. Better understanding the roles of interpretation biases in different psychopathologies might open avenues for tailored prevention and intervention paradigms.

Indexed as

AggressionAnxietyCognitive biasesExternalizingInternalizingPsychopathologySocial information processing

Identifiers

PMID37004075
PMCPMC10064950
OpenAlexW4362470725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.