Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37004065›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Predicting postoperative gastric cancer prognosis based on inflammatory factors and machine learning technology.

Cheng-Mao Zhou, Ying Wang, Jian-Jun Yang, Yu Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Research progress of machine learning applications in gastric cancer diagnosis and therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheng-Mao ZhouBig data and artificial intelligence research group, Department of Anaesthesiology, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China. zhouchengmao187@foxmail.com.
Ying WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jian-Jun YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. yjyangjj@126.com.
Yu ZhuBig data and artificial intelligence research group, Department of Anaesthesiology, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China. zhuyu07090527@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is a strong association between gastric cancer and inflammatory factors. Many studies have shown that machine learning can predict cancer patients' prognosis. However, there has been no study on predicting gastric cancer death based on machine learning using related inflammatory factor variables.

methodsSix machine learning algorithms are applied to predict total gastric cancer death after surgery.

resultsThe Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) algorithm factors accounting for the prognosis weight outcome show that the three most important factors are neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and age. The total postoperative death model showed that among patients with gastric cancer from the predictive test group: The highest accuracy was LR (0.759), followed by the GBM algorithm (0.733). For the six algorithms, the AUC values, from high to low, were LR, GBM, GBDT, forest, Tr and Xgbc. Among the six algorithms, Logistic had the highest precision (precision = 0.736), followed by the GBM algorithm (precision = 0.660). Among the six algorithms, GBM had the highest recall rate (recall = 0.667).

conclusionPostoperative mortality from gastric cancer can be predicted based on machine learning.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningPrognosisDeathGastric cancerInflammatoryMachine learningPostoperative

Identifiers

PMID37004065
PMCPMC10067164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.