Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37002837›Full record

ArticleJournal of deaf studies and deaf education2023

Spoken Sentence Complexity and Grammar Use in Children with CIs.

Michaela Socher, Elisabeth Ingo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michaela SocherDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7195-9487
Elisabeth IngoDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated if the language profiles of prelingually deaf children with bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) and children with typical hearing (TH) matched on their quantitative score on clinical spoken expressive language tasks differed in terms of sentence complexity, sentence length, and severity of grammatical errors. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of (1) proportion of simple, conjoined, and complex sentences; (2) mean length of utterance based on words and syllables; and (3) proportion of local and global grammatical errors. The results indicate that the quantitative scores on the clinical spoken expressive language tasks are related to similar spoken language profiles in children with CIs and children with TH. These findings suggest that these tests can be used for meaningful comparisons of expressive spoken language skills. However, more studies are needed on the real-life expressive language skills of children with CIs, as clinical tests often rely on one specific modality (in this study: spoken language) and might therefore not accurately represent the language skills of the children.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsChildHumansLanguageLanguage DevelopmentLinguistics

Identifiers

PMID37002837
PMCPMC10281018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.