Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37002646›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2023

Evidence-based rationale for low dose nivolumab in critically ill patients with sepsis-induced immunosuppression.

Demy A C van den Haak, Leila-Sophie Otten, Hans J P M Koenen, Ruben L Smeets, Berber Piet, Peter Pickkers, Matthijs Kox, Rob Ter Heine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in sepsis: drivers of persistent immunosuppression and targets for precision immunotherapy.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  3. Biomarkers to guide sepsis management.Annals of intensive care · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Demy A C van den HaakDepartment of Pharmacy and Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2440-8073
Leila-Sophie OttenDepartment of Pharmacy and Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1225-4740
Hans J P M KoenenLaboratory Medicine, Laboratory for Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ruben L SmeetsLaboratory Medicine, Laboratory for Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Berber PietDepartment of Pulmonology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9069-3597
Peter PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases (RCI), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Matthijs KoxDepartment of Intensive Care and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases (RCI), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rob Ter HeineDepartment of Pharmacy and Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2185-8201
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial part of critically ill patients suffer from sepsis-induced immunosuppression. Reversal of immunosuppression through PD-1 checkpoint inhibition has been proposed as a treatment strategy to overcome immunosuppression in these patients. The PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab, currently used in treatment of cancer, has been evaluated in phase I/II studies in patients with sepsis, demonstrating tolerability and signs of clinical efficacy. No proper dose finding was performed in these studies and, after a single high dose of 480 mg or 960 mg nivolumab, PD-1 inhibition persisted beyond 90 days in the majority of cases. As the duration of sepsis is ~7-10 days, prolonged PD-1 inhibition may unnecessarily induce longer-term immune-related side effects. Based on previously published pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of nivolumab, a thorough in silico dose finding study for nivolumab in critically ill patients was performed. We found that volume of distribution and clearance of nivolumab were not higher in patients with sepsis compared to the cancer population for which nivolumab is currently approved and showed profound variability. We found that with a single dose of 20 mg nivolumab, the PD-1 receptor occupancy is predicted to stay above the 90% threshold for a median of 23 days (90% prediction interval of 7-78 days). We propose to investigate this dose in critically ill patients as a potential safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapeutic intervention to treat sepsis-induced immunosuppression.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSepsisCritical IllnessHumansImmunosuppression TherapyNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorNivolumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID37002646
PMCPMC10264964
OpenAlexW4362454829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.