ReviewCardiovascular and interventional radiology2023
Current State of Robotics in Interventional Radiology.
Review in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel robot for CT-guided bone needle insertion with a rotational drilling and force-feedback speed control mechanism: preliminary evaluation in swine.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted CT-guided interventions: Where are we now and where are we going?European radiology · 2026Review
- From intravascular imaging to adaptive vascular care: intelligent photonics and digital twins in panvascular disease.Light, science & applications · 2026Review
- In vitro fenestrated endovascular aortic repair deployment and cannulation using an electromagnetically steerable guide wire.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence into paediatric interventional radiology: a review of emerging applications and future directions.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Closed-Circuit Dual-Port Injector System for Fully Automated Contrast Delivery in Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography.Neurointervention · 2026Article
- Clinical Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Endovascular Visceral Interventions.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Robotic Assistance in Visceral Interventions: A Step Toward Safer Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Fully Teleoperated Robotic Endovascular Interventions with Haptic Feedback: The SENTANTE Endovascular Robotic System.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Wireless and batteryless two-dimensional opto-electro-mechanical positioner inside 3 T MRI scanner.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Interventional Radiology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Interventional Radiology: Towards Personalized Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Robotic-Assisted Vascular Surgery: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Balancing Professional Commitments and Personal Life for Women in Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- In vitro renal artery stenting using a steerable guide wire navigated by a mobile electromagnetic field.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025Article
- Experimental evaluation of virtual needle insertion framework with enhanced haptic feedback.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Radiological biliary intervention for stone disease.Annals of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Robotic Systems in Cardiovascular Interventions: Evolving Platforms and the Path Forward.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
- Role of haptic feedback technologies and novel engineering developments for surgical training and robot-assisted surgery.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a relatively new specialty with a minimally invasive nature, the field of interventional radiology is rapidly growing. Although the application of robotic systems in this field shows great promise, such as with increased precision, accuracy, and safety, as well as reduced radiation dose and potential for teleoperated procedures, the progression of these technologies has been slow. This is partly due to the complex equipment with complicated setup procedures, the disruption to theatre flow, the high costs, as well as some device limitations, such as lack of haptic feedback. To further assess these robotic technologies, more evidence of their performance and cost-effectiveness is needed before their widespread adoption within the field. In this review, we summarise the current progress of robotic systems that have been investigated for use in vascular and non-vascular interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.