Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37002459›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023

Coding for Physical Restraint Status Among Hospitalized Patients: a 2019 National Inpatient Sample Analysis.

James Luccarelli, Chana A Sacks, Colleen Snydeman, Christopher Luccarelli, Felicia Smith, Scott R Beach, Thomas H McCoy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Physical Restraint Usage in Hospitals Across the United States: 2011-2019.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James LuccarelliDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. jluccarelli@partners.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1606-3917
Chana A SacksHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Colleen SnydemanPatient Care Services Office of Quality & Safety, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Christopher LuccarelliDepartment of Medicine and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Felicia SmithDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Scott R BeachDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Thomas H McCoyDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USDuke University · US

Funding

Dysregulation of Appetitive & Aversive Amygdala Circuits in Bipolar DisorderR01MH120991 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI BERRETTA, SABINA, MCCARROLL, STEVEN ANDREW · 2020 to 2024
$4.0M
Translational Neuroscience Training for CliniciansT32MH112485 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BUCKNER, RANDY L, ROFFMAN, JOSHUA LAWRENCE · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120991NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH112485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reduction of physical restraint utilization in the hospital setting is a key goal of high-quality care, but little is known about the rate of restraint use in general hospitals in the USA.

objectiveThis study reports the rate of physical restraint coding among acute care hospital discharges in the USA and explores associated demographic and diagnostic factors.

designThe National Inpatient Sample, a de-identified all-payors database of acute care hospital discharges in the USA, was queried for patients aged 18 and older with a diagnosis code for physical restraint status in 2019.

participantsHospitalized patients aged 18 and older. MAIN MEASURES: Demographics, discharge diagnoses, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, total hospital charges. KEY

resultsIn total, 220,470 (95% CI: 208,114 to 232,826) hospitalizations, or 0.7% of overall hospitalizations, included a discharge code for physical restraint status. There was a 700-fold difference in coding for restraint utilization based on diagnosis, with 7.4% of patients with encephalitis receiving restraint diagnosis codes compared to < 0.01% of patients with uncomplicated diabetes. In an adjusted model, male sex was associated with an odds ratio of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.4 to 1.5) for restraint utilization coding, and Black race was associated with an odds ratio of 1.3 (95% CI: 1.2 to 1.4) relative to white race.

conclusionsIn the general hospital setting, there is variability in physical restraint coding by sex, race, and clinical diagnosis. More research is needed into the appropriate utilization of restraints in the hospital setting and possible inequities in restraint utilization.

Indexed as

InpatientsRestraint, PhysicalHospitalizationHospitalsHumansLength of StayMalePatient DischargeRetrospective StudiesUnited Statescohort studiesdemographyphysicalrestraint

Identifiers

PMID37002459
PMCPMC10064960
OpenAlexW4362471226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.