Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37002403›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2023

Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities.

Lukas Heumos, Anna C Schaar, Christopher Lance, Anastasia Litinetskaya, Felix Drost, Luke Zappia, Malte D Lücken, Daniel C Strobl, Juan Henao, Fabiola Curion and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 640 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
640citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

640 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks in Stem Cells: Methods and Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

580 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lukas Heumos *Institute of Computational Biology, Department of Computational Health, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8937-3457
Anna C Schaar *Institute of Computational Biology, Department of Computational Health, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1063-005X
Christopher LanceInstitute of Computational Biology, Department of Computational Health, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1275-9802
Anastasia LitinetskayaInstitute of Computational Biology, Department of Computational Health, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.
Felix DrostInstitute of Computational Biology, Department of Computational Health, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2600-4048
Luke ZappiaInstitute of Computational Biology, Department of Computational Health, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-8565
Malte D LückenInstitute of Computational Biology, Department of Computational Health, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7464-7921
Daniel C StroblInstitute of Computational Biology, Department of Computational Health, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.
Juan HenaoInstitute of Computational Biology, Department of Computational Health, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabiola CurionInstitute of Computational Biology, Department of Computational Health, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2502-8803
Single-cell Best Practices Consortium
Herbert B SchillerInstitute of Lung Health and Immunity and Comprehensive Pneumology Center, Helmholtz Munich; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany.
Fabian J TheisInstitute of Computational Biology, Department of Computational Health, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany. fabian.theis@helmholtz-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2419-1943

Funding

A Modular Framework for Accurate, Interpretable, and Reproducible Analysis of Long Read RNA-Seq DataR01HG009937 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Michael Isaiah Love, Robert Patro · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
Integrated analyses of the epigenome to understand the molecular basis of hematopoietic malignanciesK99CA267677 · NCI · NEW YORK GENOME CENTER · PI SRIVASTAVA, AVI · 2022 to 2023
$179k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA267677NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009937Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in single-cell technologies have enabled high-throughput molecular profiling of cells across modalities and locations. Single-cell transcriptomics data can now be complemented by chromatin accessibility, surface protein expression, adaptive immune receptor repertoire profiling and spatial information. The increasing availability of single-cell data across modalities has motivated the development of novel computational methods to help analysts derive biological insights. As the field grows, it becomes increasingly difficult to navigate the vast landscape of tools and analysis steps. Here, we summarize independent benchmarking studies of unimodal and multimodal single-cell analysis across modalities to suggest comprehensive best-practice workflows for the most common analysis steps. Where independent benchmarks are not available, we review and contrast popular methods. Our article serves as an entry point for novices in the field of single-cell (multi-)omic analysis and guides advanced users to the most recent best practices.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingProteomicsSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID37002403
PMCPMC10066026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.