Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37002328›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2023

Immortal data: a qualitative exploration of patients' understandings of genomic data.

Kate Lyle, Susie Weller, Rachel Horton, Anneke Lucassen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The complex genomics of single gene disorders.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kate LyleClinical Ethics, Law and Society (CELS), Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. kate.lyle@well.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9265-7648
Susie WellerClinical Ethics, Law and Society (CELS), Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rachel HortonClinical Ethics, Law and Society (CELS), Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anneke LucassenClinical Ethics, Law and Society (CELS), Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3324-4338

Funding

Wellcome Trust 218092Wellcome Trust (Wellcome) 208053/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 218092/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As ambitions to 'mainstream' genetic and genomic medicine in the UK advance, patients are increasingly exposed to information about genomic data. Unlike the results of many other medical investigations which are linked to the time of sample collection, genomic testing provides immortal data that do not change across time, and may have relevance for relatives and generations far beyond the patient's own lifespan. This immortality raises new ethical challenges for healthcare professionals, patients and families alike, such as ensuring consent for possible future interpretations; determining when genomic data are best sought (at birth, on illness etc) and reinterpreted; and balancing the confidentiality of patients and duties of care towards others. This paper reports on qualitative work exploring the perspectives of patients and relatives participating in genomic testing, and suggests that their engagements with this immortality are shaped by: the contrast between the simplicity of sample provision and information gathered; understandings of heritability; and notions of genomic data as a collective resource. We discuss the implications this holds for practice and argue that the immortality of genomic data must take a more prominent position in patient and healthcare professional interactions.

Indexed as

GenomePatientsConfidentialityGenomicsHumansInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID37002328
PMCPMC10250296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.