Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37002296›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A clinical decision support system for AI-assisted decision-making in response-adaptive radiotherapy (ARCliDS).

Dipesh Niraula, Wenbo Sun, Jionghua Jin, Ivo D Dinov, Kyle Cuneo, Jamalina Jamaluddin, Martha M Matuszak, Yi Luo, Theodore S Lawrence, Shruti Jolly and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Data-driven decision making in patient management: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dipesh NiraulaDepartment of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. Dipesh.Niraula@moffitt.org.
Wenbo SunUniversity of Michigan Transport Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Jionghua JinDepartment of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Ivo D DinovDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Kyle CuneoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Jamalina JamaluddinDepartment of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Martha M MatuszakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Yi LuoDepartment of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Theodore S LawrenceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Shruti JollyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Randall K Ten HakenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Issam El NaqaDepartment of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.

Funding

Optimal Decision Making in Radiotherapy Using Panomics AnalyticsR01CA233487 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI EL NAQA, ISSAM M. · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Involvement of many variables, uncertainty in treatment response, and inter-patient heterogeneity challenge objective decision-making in dynamic treatment regime (DTR) in oncology. Advanced machine learning analytics in conjunction with information-rich dense multi-omics data have the ability to overcome such challenges. We have developed a comprehensive artificial intelligence (AI)-based optimal decision-making framework for assisting oncologists in DTR. In this work, we demonstrate the proposed framework to Knowledge Based Response-Adaptive Radiotherapy (KBR-ART) applications by developing an interactive software tool entitled Adaptive Radiotherapy Clinical Decision Support (ARCliDS). ARCliDS is composed of two main components: Artifcial RT Environment (ARTE) and Optimal Decision Maker (ODM). ARTE is designed as a Markov decision process and modeled via supervised learning. Given a patient's pre- and during-treatment information, ARTE can estimate treatment outcomes for a selected daily dosage value (radiation fraction size). ODM is formulated using reinforcement learning and is trained on ARTE. ODM can recommend optimal daily dosage adjustments to maximize the tumor local control probability and minimize the side effects. Graph Neural Networks (GNN) are applied to exploit the inter-feature relationships for improved modeling performance and a novel double GNN architecture is designed to avoid nonphysical treatment response. Datasets of size 117 and 292 were available from two clinical trials on adaptive RT in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and adaptive stereotactic body RT (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, respectively. For training and validation, dense data with 297 features were available for 67 NSCLC patients and 110 features for 71 HCC patients. To increase the sample size for ODM training, we applied Generative Adversarial Networks to generate 10,000 synthetic patients. The ODM was trained on the synthetic patients and validated on the original dataset. We found that, Double GNN architecture was able to correct the nonphysical dose-response trend and improve ARCliDS recommendation. The average root mean squared difference (RMSD) between ARCliDS recommendation and reported clinical decisions using double GNNs were 0.61 [0.03] Gy/frac (mean [sem]) for adaptive RT in NSCLC patients and 2.96 [0.42] Gy/frac for adaptive SBRT HCC compared to the single GNN's RMSDs of 0.97 [0.12] Gy/frac and 4.75 [0.16] Gy/frac, respectively. Overall, For NSCLC and HCC, ARCliDS with double GNNs was able to reproduce 36% and 50% of the good clinical decisions (local control and no side effects) and improve 74% and 30% of the bad clinical decisions, respectively. In conclusion, ARCliDS is the first web-based software dedicated to assist KBR-ART with multi-omics data. ARCliDS can learn from the reported clinical decisions and facilitate AI-assisted clinical decision-making for improving the outcomes in DTR.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDecision Support Systems, ClinicalLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceBromidesHumansPotassium CompoundsRadiotherapy DosageBromidespotassium bromidePotassium Compounds

Identifiers

PMID37002296
PMCPMC10066294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.