ArticleScientific reports2023
A clinical decision support system for AI-assisted decision-making in response-adaptive radiotherapy (ARCliDS).
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Data-driven decision making in patient management: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced mapping of the international classification of functioning, disability and health via a mobile app: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Personalized insulin dosing using reinforcement learning for high-fat meals and aerobic exercises in type 1 diabetes: a proof-of-concept trial.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- Patient-Specific Deep Reinforcement Learning for Proton Beam Delivery Under Inter-Phase Variations.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- Global hotspots and trends of stereotactic radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: a bibliometric analysis and visual analysis from 2015 to 2025.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in radiation treatment planning: a narrative review from automation to clinical decision support.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and multi-omics integration in liquid biopsy for genitourinary cancers: a systematic scoping review.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in adaptive radiotherapy-a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Margins of Planning Target Volume and Set-up Errors based on Megavoltage Cone-Beam CT Image Guided Radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy: Importance of Automatic Registration Plus Manual Registration.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026Article
- Developing an automatic decision-assistance tool to choose proton/photon radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted radiotherapy for pelvic and abdominal malignancies: assessing feasibility in the context of Africa-specific risks.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Assessing clinician performance using a multi-modality clinical decision-support system for lung cancer prognostication.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reinforcement Learning and Its Clinical Applications Within Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Precision Medicine and Dynamic Treatment Regimes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: AI structure segmentation is better than clinician contouring for both OARs and targets.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2025Review
- A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Intricacies of human-AI interaction in dynamic decision-making for precision oncology.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Predicting COPD Readmission: An Intelligent Clinical Decision Support System.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Involvement of many variables, uncertainty in treatment response, and inter-patient heterogeneity challenge objective decision-making in dynamic treatment regime (DTR) in oncology. Advanced machine learning analytics in conjunction with information-rich dense multi-omics data have the ability to overcome such challenges. We have developed a comprehensive artificial intelligence (AI)-based optimal decision-making framework for assisting oncologists in DTR. In this work, we demonstrate the proposed framework to Knowledge Based Response-Adaptive Radiotherapy (KBR-ART) applications by developing an interactive software tool entitled Adaptive Radiotherapy Clinical Decision Support (ARCliDS). ARCliDS is composed of two main components: Artifcial RT Environment (ARTE) and Optimal Decision Maker (ODM). ARTE is designed as a Markov decision process and modeled via supervised learning. Given a patient's pre- and during-treatment information, ARTE can estimate treatment outcomes for a selected daily dosage value (radiation fraction size). ODM is formulated using reinforcement learning and is trained on ARTE. ODM can recommend optimal daily dosage adjustments to maximize the tumor local control probability and minimize the side effects. Graph Neural Networks (GNN) are applied to exploit the inter-feature relationships for improved modeling performance and a novel double GNN architecture is designed to avoid nonphysical treatment response. Datasets of size 117 and 292 were available from two clinical trials on adaptive RT in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and adaptive stereotactic body RT (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, respectively. For training and validation, dense data with 297 features were available for 67 NSCLC patients and 110 features for 71 HCC patients. To increase the sample size for ODM training, we applied Generative Adversarial Networks to generate 10,000 synthetic patients. The ODM was trained on the synthetic patients and validated on the original dataset. We found that, Double GNN architecture was able to correct the nonphysical dose-response trend and improve ARCliDS recommendation. The average root mean squared difference (RMSD) between ARCliDS recommendation and reported clinical decisions using double GNNs were 0.61 [0.03] Gy/frac (mean [sem]) for adaptive RT in NSCLC patients and 2.96 [0.42] Gy/frac for adaptive SBRT HCC compared to the single GNN's RMSDs of 0.97 [0.12] Gy/frac and 4.75 [0.16] Gy/frac, respectively. Overall, For NSCLC and HCC, ARCliDS with double GNNs was able to reproduce 36% and 50% of the good clinical decisions (local control and no side effects) and improve 74% and 30% of the bad clinical decisions, respectively. In conclusion, ARCliDS is the first web-based software dedicated to assist KBR-ART with multi-omics data. ARCliDS can learn from the reported clinical decisions and facilitate AI-assisted clinical decision-making for improving the outcomes in DTR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.