Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37002288›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2023

Assessing the generation of tissue resident memory T cells by vaccines.

Elizabeth Rotrosen, Thomas S Kupper

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Mucosal immunity and vaccine development.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth RotrosenDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Thomas S KupperDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. tkupper@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4229-2916

Funding

Skin Homing T CellsR01AR065807 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KUPPER, THOMAS S. · 2013 to 2022
$6.3M
Generation of Robust Resident Memory T cells in Barrier Tissues through Skin VaccinationR01AI127654 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CLARK, RACHAEL ANN, KUPPER, THOMAS S. · 2017 to 2021
$6.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127654NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR065807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines have been a hugely successful public health intervention, virtually eliminating many once common diseases of childhood. However, they have had less success in controlling endemic pathogens including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, herpesviruses and HIV. A focus on vaccine-mediated generation of neutralizing antibodies, which has been a successful approach for some pathogens, has been complicated by the emergence of escape variants, which has been seen for pathogens such as influenza viruses and SARS-CoV-2, as well as for HIV-1. We discuss how vaccination strategies aimed at generating a broad and robust T cell response may offer superior protection against pathogens, particularly those that have been observed to mutate rapidly. In particular, we consider here how a focus on generating resident memory T cells may be uniquely effective for providing immunity to pathogens that typically infect (or become reactivated in) the skin, respiratory mucosa or other barrier tissues.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingHumansMemory T CellsSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingVaccines

Identifiers

PMID37002288
PMCPMC10064963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.