Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37002286›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Agent-based null models for examining experimental social interaction networks.

Susan C Fennell, James P Gleeson, Michael Quayle, Kevin Durrheim, Kevin Burke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan C FennellMACSI, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
James P GleesonMACSI, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Michael QuayleDepartment of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Kevin DurrheimDepartment of Psychology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Kevin BurkeMACSI, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. kevin.burke@ul.ie.

Funding

European Research Council 802421National Research Foundation 96059Science Foundation Ireland 16/IA/4470Science Foundation Ireland 16/RC/3918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider the analysis of temporal data arising from online interactive social experiments, which is complicated by the fact that classical independence assumptions about the observations are not satisfied. Therefore, we propose an approach that compares the output of a fitted (linear) model from the observed interaction data to that generated by an assumed agent-based null model. This allows us to discover, for example, the extent to which the structure of social interactions differs from that of random interactions. Moreover, we provide network visualisations that identify the extent of ingroup favouritism and reciprocity as well as particular individuals whose behaviour differs markedly from the norm. We specifically consider experimental data collected via the novel Virtual Interaction APPLication (VIAPPL). We find that ingroup favouritism and reciprocity are present in social interactions observed on this platform, and that these behaviours strengthen over time. Note that, while our proposed methodology was developed with VIAPPL in mind, its potential usage extends to any type of social interaction data.

Identifiers

PMID37002286
PMCPMC10066360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.