Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37002160›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of emergency medicine2023

Avoiding Escalation to the Emergency Department by Activating an In-Home Rapid Response Team in the 30 Days After Hospital-at-Home Discharge.

Heidi M Felix, Margaret R Paulson, John P Garcia, Sagar B Dugani, Ricardo A Torres-Guzman, Francisco R Avila, Karla Maita, Antonio J Forte, Michael J Maniaci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Heidi M FelixDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Margaret R PaulsonDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health Systems, Eau Claire, Wisconsin.
John P GarciaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Sagar B DuganiDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ricardo A Torres-GuzmanDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Francisco R AvilaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Karla MaitaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Antonio J ForteDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Michael J ManiaciDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.

Funding

Rural Patient Risks and Exposures for Diabetes ConTrol (Rural PREDICT)K23MD016230 · NIMHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI DUGANI, CHANDRASAGAR · 2021 to 2025
$763k
NIMHD NIH HHS K23 MD016230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMayo Clinic's virtual hybrid hospital-at-home program, Advanced Care at Home (ACH) monitors acute and post-acute patients for signs of deterioration and institutes a rapid response (RR) system if detected.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe Mayo Clinic's ACH RR team and its effect on emergency department (ED) use and readmission rates.

methodsThis was a retrospective review of all post-inpatient (restorative phase) ACH patients admitted from July 6, 2020 through June 30, 2021. If the restorative patient had a clinical decompensation, an RR was activated. All RR activations were analyzed for patient demographic characteristics, admitting and escalation diagnosis, time spent by virtual team on the RR, and whether the RR resulted in transport to the ED or hospital readmission.

resultsThree hundred and twenty patients were admitted to ACH during the study interval; 230 received restorative care. Seventy-two patients (31.3%) had events that triggered an RR. Fifty (69.4%) of the RR events were related to the admission diagnosis (p < 0.001; 95% CI 0.59-0.80). Twelve patients (16.7%) required transport to an ED for further treatment and were readmitted and 60 patients (83.3%) were able to be treated successfully in the home by the RR team (p < 0.001; 95% CI 0.08-0.25).

conclusionsThe use of an ACH RR team was effective at limiting both escalations back to an ED and hospital readmissions, as 83% of deteriorating patients were successfully stabilized and managed in their homes. Implementing a hospital-at-home RR team can reduce the need for ED use by providing critical resources and carrying out required interventions to stabilize the patient's condition.

Indexed as

Hospital Rapid Response TeamPatient DischargeEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHospitalsHumansPatient ReadmissionRetrospective Studiesavoidanceemergency departmenthospital-at-homerapid response teamvirtual hybrid

Identifiers

PMID37002160
PMCPMC10133039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.