ReviewRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2023
Evidence-based consensus guidelines on patient selection and trial stimulation for spinal cord stimulation therapy for chronic non-cancer pain.
Review in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06796920 (Spinal Cord Stimulation Surgery for Improving Lower Limb Motor Dysfunction in Adrenomyeloneuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Spinal Cord Stimulation Surgery for Improving Lower Limb Motor Dysfunction in Adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN): A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Self-Controlled Study.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Continuous electrical stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion (drg-s) as a salvation therapy in patients previously treated with spinal cord stimulation. systematic review and pooled analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- A Pragmatic Review on Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy for Parkinson's Disease Gait Related Disorders: Gaps and Controversies.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- STIMFIX™ anchoring in percutaneous spinal cord stimulation trials: interim analysis of a multicenter study.Pain management · 2025Trial
- Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation combined with a physiotherapist-led exercise programme and physical activity on prescription for chronic neuropathic pain.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Psychiatric screening and initial management in interventional pain practice: a narrative review and the Daradia Protocol.The Korean journal of pain · 2026Review
- Beyond Pain Relief: Motor Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury During Routine Outpatient Rehabilitation-A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Lead Placement During Spine Surgery.NeuroSci · 2026Article
- Incidence and etiology of impediments to spinal cord stimulator trial progression.Interventional pain medicine · 2026Article
- State of the Art in Neuromodulation or Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation: Linking Dorsal Horn Circuits, Glia, and ECAP-Guided Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Autologous Fat Grafting to Prevent Erosion and Pain Over Neuromodulation Hardware: Technical Case Series.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Article
- Spinal cord stimulation for atypical anterior chest wall complex regional pain syndrome: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Towards Selective Trial Stimulation in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical and Psychological Evidence for an Individualised Implantation Strategy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Postherpetic Neuralgia: Mechanisms, Risk Factors, and Stratified Management-A Narrative Review.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- The Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Success Score (STSS): A Narrative Review and Evidence-Informed Conceptual Framework for Structured Candidate Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- From Prediction to Monitoring: Toward a Translational Framework of Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Stimulation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Chronic opioid prescription rates following long-segment lumbar instrumentation: A comparison of academic and nonacademic centers.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
- Harnessing Spinal Cord Stimulation and Neuromodulation for Functional Restoration: From Pain Management to Motor Recovery.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Objective, Same-Day SCS Trials with ECAP-Controlled Closed-Loop Therapy: Depth of Response is Maintained from Trial to 12 months.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has demonstrated effectiveness for neuropathic pain. Unfortunately, some patients report inadequate long-term pain relief. Patient selection is emphasized for this therapy; however, the prognostic capabilities and deployment strategies of existing selection techniques, including an SCS trial, have been questioned. After approval by the Board of Directors of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, a steering committee was formed to develop evidence-based guidelines for patient selection and the role of an SCS trial. Representatives of professional organizations with clinical expertize were invited to participate as committee members. A comprehensive literature review was carried out by the steering committee, and the results organized into narrative reports, which were circulated to all the committee members. Individual statements and recommendations within each of seven sections were formulated by the steering committee and circulated to members for voting. We used a modified Delphi method wherein drafts were circulated to each member in a blinded fashion for voting. Comments were incorporated in the subsequent revisions, which were recirculated for voting to achieve consensus. Seven sections with a total of 39 recommendations were approved with 100% consensus from all the members. Sections included definitions and terminology of SCS trial; benefits of SCS trial; screening for psychosocial characteristics; patient perceptions on SCS therapy and the use of trial; other patient predictors of SCS therapy; conduct of SCS trials; and evaluation of SCS trials including minimum criteria for success. Recommendations included that SCS trial should be performed before a definitive SCS implant except in anginal pain (grade B). All patients must be screened with an objective validated instrument for psychosocial factors, and this must include depression (grade B). Despite some limitations, a trial helps patient selection and provides patients with an opportunity to experience the therapy. These recommendations are expected to guide practicing physicians and other stakeholders and should not be mistaken as practice standards. Physicians should continue to make their best judgment based on individual patient considerations and preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.