Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37001888›Full record

ReviewRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2023

Evidence-based consensus guidelines on patient selection and trial stimulation for spinal cord stimulation therapy for chronic non-cancer pain.

Harsha Shanthanna, Sam Eldabe, David Anthony Provenzano, Benedicte Bouche, Eric Buchser, Raymond Chadwick, Tina L Doshi, Rui Duarte, Christine Hunt, Frank J P M Huygen and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06796920 (Spinal Cord Stimulation Surgery for Improving Lower Limb Motor Dysfunction in Adrenomyeloneuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
23.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06796920 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Spinal Cord Stimulation Surgery for Improving Lower Limb Motor Dysfunction in Adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN): A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Self-Controlled Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorThird Military Medical UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled10ConditionsAdrenomyeloneuropathy Without Cerebral InvolvementArmsSpinal cord stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Harsha ShanthannaAnesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada shanthh@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4105-4465
Sam EldabeJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
David Anthony ProvenzanoPain Diagnostics and Interventional Care, Sewickley, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2147-3523
Benedicte BoucheCHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Eric BuchserPain Management and Neuromodulation Centre, EHC, Morges, Switzerland.
Raymond ChadwickJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Tina L DoshiAnesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5011-3298
Rui DuarteDepartment of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6485-7415
Christine HuntAnesthesiology - Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0507-7889
Frank J P M HuygenErasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Judy KnightSumma Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA.
Lynn KohanDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Richard NorthNeurosurgery, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (ret.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Joshua RosenowDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Christopher J WinfreeColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Samer NarouzeCenter for Pain Medicine, Summa Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1849-1402
James Cook University Hospital · GBJohns Hopkins University · USWestern Reserve Hospital · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USErasmus MC · NLHôpital de Morges · CHJacksonville College · USMcMaster University · CANorthwestern University · USUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Increasing Participant Diversity in a 'Sequenced-Strategy to Improve Outcomes in people with Knee Osteoarthritis Pain (SKOAP)UH3AR077360 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, CLAUDIA MICHELLE, CASTILLO, RENAN C · 2020 to 2023
$13.8M
Mentorship of Junior Investigators on HEAL-SKOAPK24AR081143 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, CLAUDIA MICHELLE · 2021 to 2021
$324k
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR081143NIAMS NIH HHS UH3 AR077360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has demonstrated effectiveness for neuropathic pain. Unfortunately, some patients report inadequate long-term pain relief. Patient selection is emphasized for this therapy; however, the prognostic capabilities and deployment strategies of existing selection techniques, including an SCS trial, have been questioned. After approval by the Board of Directors of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, a steering committee was formed to develop evidence-based guidelines for patient selection and the role of an SCS trial. Representatives of professional organizations with clinical expertize were invited to participate as committee members. A comprehensive literature review was carried out by the steering committee, and the results organized into narrative reports, which were circulated to all the committee members. Individual statements and recommendations within each of seven sections were formulated by the steering committee and circulated to members for voting. We used a modified Delphi method wherein drafts were circulated to each member in a blinded fashion for voting. Comments were incorporated in the subsequent revisions, which were recirculated for voting to achieve consensus. Seven sections with a total of 39 recommendations were approved with 100% consensus from all the members. Sections included definitions and terminology of SCS trial; benefits of SCS trial; screening for psychosocial characteristics; patient perceptions on SCS therapy and the use of trial; other patient predictors of SCS therapy; conduct of SCS trials; and evaluation of SCS trials including minimum criteria for success. Recommendations included that SCS trial should be performed before a definitive SCS implant except in anginal pain (grade B). All patients must be screened with an objective validated instrument for psychosocial factors, and this must include depression (grade B). Despite some limitations, a trial helps patient selection and provides patients with an opportunity to experience the therapy. These recommendations are expected to guide practicing physicians and other stakeholders and should not be mistaken as practice standards. Physicians should continue to make their best judgment based on individual patient considerations and preferences.

Indexed as

Chronic PainSpinal Cord StimulationAnalgesics, OpioidHumansPain ManagementPatient SelectionSpinal CordTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, Opioidback painchronic painpain managementspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37001888
PMCPMC10370290
OpenAlexW4362458754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.