ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2023
Sexual dysfunction, distress, and care-seeking among females during the preconception period.
Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations between urinary biomarkers of phthalates and phthalate alternatives and female sexual function in a North American cohort.The journal of sexual medicine · 2025Article
- Strategies for self-management of painful intercourse among female pregnancy planners.The journal of sexual medicine · 2025Article
- Female sexual function and distress and time-to-pregnancy in a prospective preconception cohort.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
- Factors Associated with Postpartum Sexual Function During the Puerperium Period: A Cross-Sectional Study in Greece.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the high prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in population-based studies and the importance of sexual functioning for mixed-sex couples attempting conception, little is known about female sexual function in the preconception period.
objectiveThis descriptive study aimed to assess the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction, distress, and pain with intercourse in a preconception population of pregnancy planners. The study also explored the extent to which participants discussed their sex lives with a healthcare provider during a preconception visit. STUDY
designWe used data from Pregnancy Study Online, a web-based preconception cohort study (August 2020-October 2022). Eligible participants identified as female and were aged 21 to 45 years, residents of the United States or Canada, attempting pregnancy, and not using fertility treatments at cohort entry. At enrollment, participants completed a detailed baseline questionnaire. Thirty days after enrollment, participants were invited to complete an optional questionnaire about sexual function. Our study included 1120 participants who responded to the sexual function questionnaire within 1 year of completing their baseline questionnaire. We assessed sexual dysfunction using the 6-item Female Sexual Function Index, and sexual distress using the Female Sexual Distress Scale, which assess sexual function and distress in the previous 4 weeks, respectively. We also asked participants whether they had discussed their plans to conceive with a healthcare provider, and if so, whether they discussed their sex lives. If not, we collected information on perceived barriers.
resultsTwenty-five percent of the sample met criteria for female sexual dysfunction, whereas 12.2% met the criteria for sexual distress; 8% of our sample reported both sexual dysfunction and sexual distress. Thirty percent reported at least some pain with intercourse in the past 4 weeks. Although over 80% of the sample reported discussing their conception plans with a healthcare provider, 70% of these participants did not discuss their sex lives. The most commonly reported reasons for not discussing their sex life with a provider was not experiencing a sexual health issue, the provider not asking, feeling nervous/uncomfortable/ashamed, and feeling it was not relevant to becoming pregnant or inappropriate to discuss. The percentage of participants who reported discussing their sex lives varied across provider type, with those seeing midwives having the highest percentage (39%), followed by nurse practitioners (36%) and obstetrician-gynecologists (34%).
conclusionSexual dysfunction, distress, and painful intercourse are prevalent in the preconception period, but participants frequently did not discuss their sex lives when discussing plans to conceive. The provider not asking was a commonly reported barrier. Providers may consider raising the issue of sexual functioning at the time of a preconception visit to better support patients who may be dealing with a sexual function issue while attempting pregnancy. These findings may not generalize beyond a primarily non-Hispanic White, highly educated, and high-income population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.