Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37001374›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2023

А case of a mucocele of the appendix - A diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma.

Georgi Jelev, Ivan Vassilev, Slavyana Usheva, Todor Yanev, Theophil Sedloev

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georgi JelevDepartment of Surgery - University Hospital "Queen Joanna - ISUL", Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria.
Ivan VassilevDepartment of Surgery - University Hospital "Queen Joanna - ISUL", Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria.
Slavyana UshevaDepartment of Surgery - University Hospital "Queen Joanna - ISUL", Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria. Electronic address: slavyana_u@abv.bg.
Todor YanevDepartment of Surgery - University Hospital "Queen Joanna - ISUL", Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria.
Theophil SedloevDepartment of Surgery - University Hospital "Queen Joanna - ISUL", Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria.
Queen Giovanna Hospital · BGMedical University of Sofia · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and importanceMucocele of the appendix is a rare pathology with an estimated incidence of less than 1 % of all appendectomies. Here is a report of a 67-year-old Bulgarian female, diagnosed with a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) after immunohistochemical analysis, which changed the therapeutic strategy. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a patient, initially admitted to the Gastroenterology Department due to complaints of dyspepsia and intermittent watery diarrhea. Abdominal ultrasound revealed an oval hypoechoic heterogeneous formation with mixed echo structure in the ileocecal region. Laparoscopic appendectomy with partial cecal resection was performed. The additional immunohistochemical assessments classified the finding as a LAMN with 12 % proliferative index (Ki-67), pancreatin-positive reaction in epithelial cells and CD68-positive reaction in macrophages. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix are classified on a spectrum from benign to malignant based upon certain features on histological examination. When there are signs of malignancy such as metastases in the loco-regional lymph nodes, perforation with intraperitoneal dissemination and affected base of the appendix (positive margins of resection), more aggressive approach is recommended - right hemicolectomy. Simple appendectomy is the choice for patients with benign mucocele as suggested by the presence of a normal caecum and appendicular base with no evidence of perforation.

conclusionAppendiceal mucocele could be an illustrative example of a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to the rarity of the disease. Pathohistological examination and mainly immunohistochemical tests are the key to correct diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

AppendixImmunohistochemistryLow-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasmMucocele

Identifiers

PMID37001374
PMCPMC10070622
OpenAlexW4361285276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.