ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2023
Giant bladder stone a rare cause of renal failure, a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Giant bladder stone presenting with renal failure 15 years after ileocystoplasty augmentation: A case report.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- Giant urinary bladder stone: A rare case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024Article
- A case report of a giant bladder stone (12 × 8 cm, 610 g).Radiology case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceBladder stones constitute approximately 5 % of all urinary tract stones. A giant bladder stone weighing >100 g and a diameter of >4 cm is a rare finding. Bladder stones are more common in adult males. Giant bladder stones are a rare entity in western practice, and are usually associated with bladder outlet obstruction, urinary tract infections, or the presence of intravesical foreign bodies and are rarely associated with renal failure. CASE PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old Ethiopian male patient presented with facial puffiness of two weeks duration which worsened early in the morning. He had a history of recurrent suprapubic pain, and straining during urination. On examination, he had a tender suprapubic mass. Investigations showed bilateral hydronephrosis and renal failure. Subsequently, the patient was diagnosed with a huge bladder stone with acute renal failure. Later, the stone was surgically removed and the patient was discharged improved. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Risk factors for the development of bladder stones consist of bladder outlet obstruction, neurogenic bladder, chronic bacteriuria, presence of intravesical foreign substances, bladder diverticula, and rarely, upper urinary tract stone. Recurrent urinary tract infections, urinary retention, and hematuria are common signs of this disorder and rarely cause a renal failure like our patient.
conclusionA giant bladder stone is a rare disease in modern urology clinical practice. Despite its rarity, giant bladder stone can cause acute renal failure and needs more attention. A comprehensive clinical assessment and thorough investigation are required during the evaluation of this kind of patient to prevent misdiagnosis and to ensure prompt treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.